Venturelli Massimo, Cè Emiliano, Limonta Eloisa, Bisconti Angela Valentina, Devoto Michela, Rampichini Susanna, Esposito Fabio
Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy;
Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2017 Jan 1;122(1):112-120. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00721.2016. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
Passive static stretching (SS), circulatory cuff occlusion (CCO), and the combination of both (SS + CCO) have been used to investigate the mechano- and metaboreflex, respectively. However, the effects of dynamic stretching (DS) alone or in combination with CCO (DS + CCO) on the same reflexes have never been explored. The aim of the study was to compare central and peripheral hemodynamic responses to DS, SS, DS + CCO, and SS + CCO. In 10 participants, femoral blood flow (FBF), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were assessed during DS and SS of the quadriceps muscle with and without CCO. Blood lactate concentration [La] in the lower limb undergoing CCO was also measured. FBF increased significantly in DS and SS by 365 ± 98 and 377 ± 102 ml/min, respectively. Compared with baseline, hyperemia was negligible during DS + CCO and SS + CCO (+11 ± 98 and +5 ± 87 ml/min, respectively). DS generated a significant, sustained increase in HR and CO (∼40s), while SS induced a blunted and delayed cardioacceleration (∼20 s). After CCO, [La] in the lower limb increased by 135%. Changes in HR and CO during DS + CCO and SS + CCO were similar to DS and SS alone. MAP decreased significantly by ∼5% during DS and SS, did not change in DS + CCO, and increased by 4% in SS + CCO. The present data indicate a reduced mechanoreflex response to SS compared with DS (i.e., different HR and CO changes). SS evoked a hyperemia similar to DS. The similar central hemodynamics recorded during stretching and [La] accumulation suggest a marginal interaction between mechano- and metaboreflex.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY: Different modalities of passive stretching administration (dynamic or static) in combination with circulatory cuff occlusion may reduce or amplify the mechano- and metaboreflex. We showed a reduced mechanoreflex response to static compared with dynamic stretching. The lack of increase in central hemodynamics during the combined mechano- and metaboreflex stimulation implicates marginal interactions between these two pathways.
被动静态拉伸(SS)、循环袖带阻断(CCO)以及两者的联合应用(SS + CCO)已分别用于研究机械反射和代谢反射。然而,单独动态拉伸(DS)或与CCO联合应用(DS + CCO)对相同反射的影响从未被探究过。本研究的目的是比较DS、SS、DS + CCO和SS + CCO对中枢和外周血流动力学的反应。在10名参与者中,评估了股四头肌进行DS和SS时,有无CCO情况下的股血流量(FBF)、心率(HR)、心输出量(CO)和平均动脉压(MAP)。还测量了接受CCO的下肢的血乳酸浓度[La]。DS和SS期间,FBF分别显著增加365±98和377±102 ml/min。与基线相比,DS + CCO和SS + CCO期间的充血可忽略不计(分别为+11±98和+5±87 ml/min)。DS使HR和CO显著持续增加(约40秒),而SS引起的心脏加速反应减弱且延迟(约20秒)。CCO后,下肢的[La]增加了135%。DS + CCO和SS + CCO期间HR和CO的变化与单独的DS和SS相似。DS和SS期间MAP显著降低约5%,DS + CCO期间无变化,SS + CCO期间增加4%。目前的数据表明,与DS相比,对SS的机械反射反应降低(即HR和CO变化不同)。SS引起的充血与DS相似。拉伸过程中记录的相似中枢血流动力学和[La]积累表明机械反射和代谢反射之间存在微弱的相互作用。
被动拉伸给药的不同方式(动态或静态)与循环袖带阻断相结合可能会降低或增强机械反射和代谢反射。我们发现与动态拉伸相比,对静态拉伸的机械反射反应降低。在机械反射和代谢反射联合刺激期间中枢血流动力学缺乏增加意味着这两条途径之间存在微弱的相互作用。