Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health (SCIBIS), Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0256656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256656. eCollection 2021.
The current study aimed to verify whether or not passive static stretching affects balance control capacity. Thirty-eight participants (19 women and 19 men) underwent a passive static stretching session, involving the knee extensor/flexor and dorsi/plantarflexor muscles, and a control session (no stretching, CTRL). Before (PRE), immediately after (POST), after 15 (POST15) and 30 min (POST30) from stretching (or rest in CTRL), balance control was evaluated under static and dynamic conditions, with open/closed eyes, and with/without somatosensory perturbation (foam under the feet). During tests, centre of pressure (CoP) sway area and perimeter and antero-posterior and medio-lateral sway mean speed were computed. Surface electromyography root mean square (sEMG RMS) was calculated from the vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, gastrocnemius medialis, and tibialis anterior muscles during MVC and during the balance tests. Hip flexion/extension and dorsi/plantarflexion range of motion (ROM), maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and sEMG RMS during MVC were measured at the same time points. After stretching, ROM increased (≈6.5%; P<0.05), while MVC and sEMG RMS decreased (≈9% and ≈7.5%, respectively; P<0.05). Regardless of the testing condition, CoP sway area and the perimeter remained similar, while antero-posterior and medio-lateral sway mean speed decreased by ≈8% and ≈12%, respectively (P<0.05). sEMG RMS during the balance tests increased in all muscles in POST (≈7%, P<0.05). All variables recovered in POST30. No changes occurred in CTRL. Passive static stretching did not affect the overall balance control ability. However, greater muscle activation was required to maintain similar CoP sway, thus suggesting a decrease in muscle efficiency.
本研究旨在验证被动静态伸展是否会影响平衡控制能力。38 名参与者(19 名女性和 19 名男性)接受了被动静态伸展,包括膝关节伸肌/屈肌和背屈/跖屈肌,以及对照组(无伸展,CTRL)。在伸展前(PRE)、伸展后即刻(POST)、伸展后 15 分钟(POST15)和 30 分钟(POST30)时,在静态和动态条件下,睁眼和闭眼,有和没有本体感觉干扰(脚下的泡沫)下评估平衡控制能力。在测试过程中,计算了中心压力(CoP)摆动面积和周长以及前后和左右摆动平均速度。在最大等长收缩(MVC)和平衡测试期间,从股外侧肌、股二头肌、腓肠肌内侧和胫骨前肌计算表面肌电图均方根(sEMG RMS)。在相同的时间点测量髋关节屈伸和背屈/跖屈ROM、MVC 和 MVC 期间的 sEMG RMS。伸展后,ROM 增加(≈6.5%;P<0.05),而 MVC 和 sEMG RMS 减少(≈9%和≈7.5%;P<0.05)。无论测试条件如何,CoP 摆动面积和周长保持相似,而前后和左右摆动平均速度分别降低了≈8%和≈12%(P<0.05)。POST 时所有肌肉的 sEMG RMS 在平衡测试中增加(≈7%,P<0.05)。所有变量在 POST30 时均恢复。CTRL 中没有变化。被动静态伸展不会影响整体平衡控制能力。然而,为了保持相似的 CoP 摆动,需要更大的肌肉激活,这表明肌肉效率降低。