Card David, Giuliano Laura
Center for Labor Economics, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3880;
Department of Economics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13678-13683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605043113. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
Low-income and minority students are substantially underrepresented in gifted education programs. The disparities persist despite efforts by many states and school districts to broaden participation through changes in their eligibility criteria. One explanation for the persistent gap is that standard processes for identifying gifted students, which are based largely on the referrals of parents and teachers, tend to miss qualified students from underrepresented groups. We study this hypothesis using the experiences of a large urban school district following the introduction of a universal screening program for second graders. Without any changes in the standards for gifted eligibility, the screening program led to large increases in the fractions of economically disadvantaged and minority students placed in gifted programs. Comparisons of the newly identified gifted students with those who would have been placed in the absence of screening show that Blacks and Hispanics, free/reduced price lunch participants, English language learners, and girls were all systematically "underreferred" in the traditional parent/teacher referral system. Our findings suggest that parents and teachers often fail to recognize the potential of poor and minority students and those with limited English proficiency.
低收入和少数族裔学生在天才教育项目中的代表性严重不足。尽管许多州和学区努力通过改变资格标准来扩大参与度,但这种差距依然存在。持续存在差距的一个原因是,识别天才学生的标准流程主要基于家长和教师的推荐,这往往会遗漏来自代表性不足群体的合格学生。我们利用一个大型城市学区在为二年级学生引入通用筛查项目后的经历来研究这一假设。在天才资格标准没有任何变化的情况下,筛查项目使得进入天才项目的经济弱势和少数族裔学生比例大幅增加。将新识别出的天才学生与在没有筛查的情况下会被选入的学生进行比较后发现,黑人、西班牙裔、享受免费或减价午餐的学生、英语学习者以及女生在传统的家长/教师推荐系统中都被系统性地“推荐不足”。我们的研究结果表明,家长和教师常常未能认识到贫困学生、少数族裔学生以及英语水平有限的学生的潜力。