Suppr超能文献

利用标准化考试成绩将一般认知能力纳入教育研究与政策中。

Using Standardized Test Scores to Include General Cognitive Ability in Education Research and Policy.

作者信息

Wai Jonathan, Brown Matt I, Chabris Christopher F

机构信息

Department of Education Reform, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.

Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Lewisburg, PA 17837, USA.

出版信息

J Intell. 2018 Aug 2;6(3):37. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030037.

Abstract

In education research and education policy, much attention is paid to schools, curricula, and teachers, but little attention is paid to the characteristics of students. Differences in general cognitive ability () are often overlooked as a source of important variance among schools and in outcomes among students within schools. Standardized test scores such as the SAT and ACT are reasonably good proxies for and are available for most incoming college students. Though the idea of being important in education is quite old, we present contemporary evidence that colleges and universities in the United States vary considerably in the average cognitive ability of their students, which correlates strongly with other methods (including international methods) of ranking colleges. We also show that these differences are reflected in the extent to which graduates of colleges are represented in various high-status and high-income occupations. Finally, we show how including individual-level measures of cognitive ability can substantially increase the statistical power of experiments designed to measure educational treatment effects. We conclude that education policy researchers should give more consideration to the concept of individual differences in cognitive ability as well as other factors.

摘要

在教育研究和教育政策中,人们十分关注学校、课程和教师,却很少关注学生的特点。一般认知能力的差异常常被忽视,而它是学校间存在重要差异以及校内学生成绩存在差异的一个重要来源。诸如学术能力评估测试(SAT)和美国大学入学考试(ACT)这样的标准化考试成绩是衡量一般认知能力的相当不错的指标,并且大多数即将入学的大学生都有这些成绩。尽管一般认知能力在教育中很重要这一观点由来已久,但我们给出当代证据表明,美国的学院和大学在学生的平均认知能力方面存在很大差异,这与其他(包括国际上的)大学排名方法密切相关。我们还表明,这些认知能力差异体现在各学院毕业生在各种高地位和高收入职业中的占比情况。最后,我们展示了纳入个体层面的认知能力测量如何能大幅提高旨在衡量教育治疗效果的实验的统计效力。我们得出结论,教育政策研究者应更多地考虑认知能力个体差异这一概念以及其他因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50eb/6480800/2aa3634afec2/jintelligence-06-00037-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验