Gustafsson Louise, Brown Ted, McKinstry Carol, Caine Anne-Maree
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Aust Occup Ther J. 2017 Apr;64(2):159-169. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12337. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Practice education is an integral component of the learning process for occupational therapy students. The dramatic increase in Australian occupational therapy programmes and students enrolled over the last decade is placing exponential demands on universities and practice education providers to meet accreditation and registration requirements. This study aimed to explore practice education from the perspectives of Australian occupational therapy university programmes.
A purpose-designed survey was emailed to the heads of all Australian occupational therapy programmes. The survey gathered qualitative and quantitative data on courses offered, number of students, practice education hours and models, practice education administration and funding, and challenges for stakeholders. All data were summarised and are presented descriptively.
Responses were received from 21 (95.5%) Australian university occupational therapy programmes, with a total enrolment of 5569 undergraduate and 659 graduate-entry masters students. Practice education hours were predominantly in the later years of study and used an apprenticeship model for supervision. There was a trend for observation, simulation and service-learning experiences to be placed in the early years of programmes. Participants reported that the increasing student numbers presented difficulties within the changing clinical contexts. There was a call to re-examine the 1000-hour requirement for practice education.
Practice education is a critical issue for Australian occupational therapy. Increasing student numbers place mounting financial and resource demands on education programmes and practice education providers. There is a need for a national, collaborative approach to develop guidelines and processes to ensure sustainability relating to practice education.
背景/目的:实践教育是职业治疗专业学生学习过程中不可或缺的组成部分。在过去十年中,澳大利亚职业治疗课程和注册学生数量急剧增加,这对大学和实践教育提供者提出了指数级的要求,以满足认证和注册要求。本研究旨在从澳大利亚职业治疗大学课程的角度探讨实践教育。
向所有澳大利亚职业治疗课程的负责人发送了一份专门设计的调查问卷。该调查收集了有关所提供课程、学生人数、实践教育时长和模式、实践教育管理与资金以及利益相关者面临的挑战的定性和定量数据。所有数据均进行了汇总并以描述性方式呈现。
收到了21个(95.5%)澳大利亚大学职业治疗课程的回复,本科学生总入学人数为5569人,研究生入学硕士学生为659人。实践教育时长主要集中在学习后期,并采用学徒制进行督导。在课程早期安排观察、模拟和服务学习体验的趋势较为明显。参与者报告称,在不断变化的临床环境中,学生人数的增加带来了困难。有人呼吁重新审视实践教育1000小时的要求。
实践教育是澳大利亚职业治疗的一个关键问题。学生人数的增加给教育课程和实践教育提供者带来了越来越大的财务和资源需求。需要采取全国性的协作方法来制定指导方针和流程,以确保实践教育的可持续性。