Suppr超能文献

一项比较三种纤维光辅助技术将声门上气道转换为带套囊气管导管的尸体研究。

A cadaver study comparing three fibreoptic-assisted techniques for converting a supraglottic airway to a cuffed tracheal tube.

机构信息

Northern Sydney Anaesthetic Research Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Sydney Clinical Skills and Simulation Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2017 Feb;72(2):223-229. doi: 10.1111/anae.13733. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

Abstract

After rescuing an airway with a supraglottic airway device, a method to convert it to a cuffed tracheal tube is often needed. The best method to do this has never been directly studied. We compared three techniques for conversion of a standard LMA Unique airway to a cuffed endotracheal tube using a fibrescope. The primary endpoint was time to intubation, with secondary endpoints of success rate, perceived difficulty and preferred technique. We also investigated the relationship between level of training and prior training and experience with the techniques on the primary outcome. The mean (95% CI) time to intubation using a direct tracheal tube technique of 37 (31-42) s was significantly shorter than either the Aintree intubation catheter technique at 70 (60-80) s, or a guidewire technique at 126 (110-141) s (p < 0.001). Most (13/24) participants rated the tracheal tube as their preferred technique, while 11/24 preferred the Aintree technique. In terms of perceived difficulty, 23/24, 21/24 and 9/24 participants rated the tracheal tube technique, Aintree technique and guidewire technique, respectively, as either very easy or easy. There was no relationship between prior training, prior experience or level of training on time to completion of any of the techniques. We conclude the tracheal tube and Aintree techniques both provide a rapid and easy method for conversion of a supraglottic airway device to a cuffed tracheal tube. The guidewire technique cannot be recommended.

摘要

在使用声门上气道装置(supraglottic airway device)抢救气道后,通常需要将其转换为带套囊的气管导管。但到目前为止,还没有直接研究过哪种方法是最好的。我们使用纤维支气管镜比较了三种将标准 LMA Unique 气道转换为带套囊的气管内导管的方法。主要终点是插管时间,次要终点是成功率、感知难度和首选技术。我们还研究了培训水平以及之前对这些技术的培训和经验与主要结果之间的关系。直接气管导管技术的平均(95%CI)插管时间为 37(31-42)s,明显短于 Aintree 插管导管技术的 70(60-80)s 或导丝技术的 126(110-141)s(p < 0.001)。大多数(13/24)参与者认为气管导管是他们的首选技术,而 11/24 人更喜欢 Aintree 技术。在感知难度方面,23/24、21/24 和 9/24 名参与者分别将气管导管技术、Aintree 技术和导丝技术评为非常容易或容易。在任何技术的完成时间方面,之前的培训、经验或培训水平之间都没有关系。我们的结论是,气管导管和 Aintree 技术都为将声门上气道装置快速简便地转换为带套囊的气管导管提供了方法。导丝技术不可推荐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验