Suppr超能文献

在颈椎固定模型中将 I-gel 转换为确定性气道:Aintree 插管导管与长气管内导管。

Conversion of I-gel to definitive airway in a cervical immobilized manikin: Aintree intubation catheter vs long endotracheal tube.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea.

Office of Biostatics, Ajou Research Institute for Innovative Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, 164, World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01069-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

After prehospital insertion of i-gel, a popular supraglottic airway (SGA), fiberoptic-guided intubation through i-gel is often required to switch the i-gel to a definitive airway for anticipated difficult airway. The Aintree intubation catheter (AIC) was developed for this purpose yet it requires many procedural steps during which maintenance of adequate ventilation is difficult. We custom-made a long endotracheal tube (LET) which may facilitate this procedure and compared the efficacy of the AIC and LET in a cervical immobilized manikin.

METHODS

In this 2 × 2 crossover manikin-based trial, 20 anaesthesiologists and residents performed both methods in random order. Total intubation time, fiberoptic time, and procedure time were recorded. The ease of insertion, procedure failure rate, difficulty score, and participants' preference were recorded.

RESULTS

Total intubation time was significantly shorter for the LET than the AIC group (70.8 ± 16.4 s vs 94.0 ± 28.4 s, P = 0.001). The procedure time was significantly shorter in the LET group (51.9 ± 13.8 s vs 76.5 ± 25.4 s, P <  0.001). The ease of insertion score was lower, i.e., easier, in the AIC than the LET group (2.0 [1.0-2.75] vs 1.0 [1.0-1.0], P <  0.001). Fiberoptic time (19.0 ± 6.9 s vs 17.5 ± 12.3 s) and subjective difficulty (4.0 [3.0-6.0] vs 4.0 [3.0-5.75]) were similar between groups. Fourteen participants preferred the LET method (70%) due to its fewer procedural steps.

CONCLUSIONS

LET resulted in a shorter intubation time than the AIC during fiberoptic-guided intubation through the i-gel, possibly due to the less procedural steps compared to AIC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03645174 (ClinicalTrials.gov, Aug 22, 2018).

摘要

背景

在院前插入 i-gel 后,通常需要通过纤维支气管镜引导 i-gel 插管,以将 i-gel 切换为预期困难气道的确定性气道。Aintree 插管导管(AIC)就是为此目的而开发的,但在这个过程中需要进行许多步骤,在此期间很难维持足够的通气。我们定制了一个长的气管内导管(LET),这可能会使这个过程变得更容易,并在一个颈椎固定的人体模型上比较了 AIC 和 LET 的效果。

方法

在这项 2×2 交叉人体模型试验中,20 名麻醉医师和住院医师随机进行了这两种方法。记录总插管时间、纤维支气管镜时间和操作时间。记录插入的难易程度、操作失败率、难度评分和参与者的偏好。

结果

LET 组的总插管时间明显短于 AIC 组(70.8±16.4 s 比 94.0±28.4 s,P=0.001)。LET 组的操作时间明显更短(51.9±13.8 s 比 76.5±25.4 s,P<0.001)。插入的难易程度评分在 AIC 组较低,即更容易(2.0[1.0-2.75]比 1.0[1.0-1.0],P<0.001)。纤维支气管镜时间(19.0±6.9 s 比 17.5±12.3 s)和主观难度(4.0[3.0-6.0]比 4.0[3.0-5.75])在两组之间相似。14 名参与者因 AIC 步骤较少而更喜欢 LET 方法(70%)。

结论

在纤维支气管镜引导下通过 i-gel 进行插管时,LET 组的插管时间比 AIC 组短,这可能是因为与 AIC 相比,LET 组的操作步骤较少。

试验注册

NCT03645174(ClinicalTrials.gov,2018 年 8 月 22 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7b4/7302158/c05e011b2e04/12871_2020_1069_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验