Shiozawa Kazue, Watanabe Manabu, Ikehara Takashi, Matsukiyo Yasushi, Kogame Michio, Kikuchi Yoshinori, Otsuka Yuichiro, Kaneko Hironori, Igarashi Yoshinori, Sumino Yasukiyo
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Medical Center, Omori Hospital, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Toho University Medical Center, Omori Hospital, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
J Clin Ultrasound. 2017 Mar 4;45(3):138-144. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22421. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
To compare contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) using Sonazoid with Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) in the diagnosis of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.
A total of 69 patients diagnosed with or suspected of having liver metastasis were enrolled. These hepatic lesions were diagnosed by histopathological examination after surgical resection or based on follow-up using various imaging modalities. The diagnostic accuracies of CEUS and EOB-MRI were compared.
One hundred thirty-three lesions were detected. Of these lesions, 109 were diagnosed as liver metastases. Of the 133 lesions, 90.2% were detected on CEUS, and 98.5% on EOB-MRI. One hundred nine lesions were diagnosed as liver metastasis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosis were 0.906 and 0.851 on CEUS and EOB-MRI, respectively (p = 0.41). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were 90.8%, 84.5%, 97.1%, 67.1%, and 90.2%, respectively, for CEUS, and 95.4%, 70.8%, 93.7%, 77.3%, and 91%, respectively, for EOB-MRI.
CEUS has a higher specificity and PPV for the diagnosis of liver metastasis than EOB-MRI. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 45:138-144, 2017.
比较使用声诺维的超声造影(CEUS)与钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像(EOB-MRI)在诊断结直肠癌肝转移患者中的应用。
共纳入69例诊断为或疑似患有肝转移的患者。这些肝脏病变通过手术切除后的组织病理学检查或基于多种成像方式的随访进行诊断。比较CEUS和EOB-MRI的诊断准确性。
共检测到133个病变。其中,109个被诊断为肝转移。在这133个病变中,CEUS检测到90.2%,EOB-MRI检测到98.5%。109个病变被诊断为肝转移。CEUS和EOB-MRI诊断的受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为0.906和0.851(p = 0.41)。CEUS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值和总体准确性分别为90.8%、84.5%、97.1%、67.1%和90.2%,EOB-MRI分别为95.4%、70.8%、93.7%、77.3%和91%。
在诊断肝转移方面,CEUS比EOB-MRI具有更高的特异性和PPV。© 2016威利期刊公司。《临床超声杂志》45:138 - 144,2017。