Knauer Katja, Homazava Nadzeya, Junghans Marion, Werner Inge
Federal Office for Agriculture, Bern, Switzerland.
Swiss Centre for Applied Ecotoxicology Eawag-EPFL, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jul;13(4):585-600. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1867. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
Environmental risk assessment is an essential part of the approval process for pesticides. Exposure concentrations are compared with ecotoxicological data obtained from standardized laboratory studies and, if available, from field studies to determine the risk of a substance or formulation for aquatic communities. Predicted concentrations in surface waters are derived using, for example, the European FOrum for the Co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their USe (FOCUS) or the German Exposit models, which distinguish between exposure to dissolved and particle-associated pesticide concentrations, because the dissolved concentration is thought to be the best predictor of bioavailability and toxicity. Water and particle-associated concentrations are estimated based on the organic carbon-water partitioning coefficient (K ). This review summarizes published information on the influence of natural suspended solids on bioavailability and toxicity of pesticides to aquatic organisms (algae, invertebrates and fish), and the value of log K and log K (octanol-water coefficient) as sole predictors of the bioavailable fraction is discussed. The information showed that: 1) the quality and origin of suspended solids played an important role in influencing pesticide bioavailability and toxicity; 2) a decrease in toxicity due to the presence of suspended solids was shown only for pyrethroid insecticides with log K greater than 5, but the extent of this reduction depended on particle concentration and size, and potentially also on the ecotoxicological endpoint; 3) for pesticides with a log K less than 3 (e.g., triazines, carbamates, and organophosphates), the impact of particles on bioavailability and toxicity is small and species dependent; and 4) pesticide bioavailability is greatly influenced by the test species and their physiology (e.g., feeding behavior or digestion). We conclude that exposure of aquatic organisms to pesticides and environmental risk of many pesticides might be underestimated in prospective risk assessment, when predicted environmental concentration is estimated based on the K of a compound. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:585-600. © 2016 SETAC.
环境风险评估是农药审批过程的重要组成部分。将暴露浓度与从标准化实验室研究以及(如有)现场研究获得的生态毒理学数据进行比较,以确定某种物质或制剂对水生生物群落的风险。地表水的预测浓度通过例如欧洲农药归趋模型协调论坛及其应用(FOCUS)或德国暴露模型得出,这些模型区分了溶解态农药浓度和颗粒态农药浓度的暴露情况,因为溶解态浓度被认为是生物可利用性和毒性的最佳预测指标。水相和颗粒相浓度是根据有机碳 - 水分配系数(K)估算的。本综述总结了已发表的关于天然悬浮固体对农药对水生生物(藻类、无脊椎动物和鱼类)的生物可利用性和毒性影响的信息,并讨论了log K和log K(辛醇 - 水系数)作为生物可利用部分唯一预测指标的价值。信息表明:1)悬浮固体的质量和来源在影响农药生物可利用性和毒性方面起着重要作用;2)仅对于log K大于5的拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂,悬浮固体的存在会导致毒性降低,但其降低程度取决于颗粒浓度和大小,还可能取决于生态毒理学终点;3)对于log K小于3的农药(如三嗪类、氨基甲酸酯类和有机磷酸酯类),颗粒对生物可利用性和毒性的影响较小且因物种而异;4)农药生物可利用性受测试物种及其生理特性(如摄食行为或消化)的极大影响。我们得出结论,在基于化合物的K估算预测环境浓度时,前瞻性风险评估中水生生物对农药的暴露和许多农药的环境风险可能被低估。《综合环境评估与管理》2017年;13:585 - 600。© 2016 SETAC。