School of Dental Hygiene, College of Dentistry, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Department of Dental Hygiene, Division of Health Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA.
Int J Dent Hyg. 2017 Nov;15(4):e163-e172. doi: 10.1111/idh.12256. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
Theories provide a structural knowing about concept relationships, practice intricacies, and intuitions and thus shape the distinct body of the profession. Capturing ways of knowing and being is essential to any professions' practice, education and research. This process defines the phenomenon of the profession - its existence or experience. Theory evaluation is a systematic criterion-based assessment of a specific theory. This study presents a theory analysis of the Dental Hygiene Human Needs Conceptual Model (DH HNCM).
Using the Walker and Avant Theory Analysis, a seven-step process, the DH HNCM, was analysed and evaluated for its meaningfulness and contribution to dental hygiene. The steps include the following: (i) investigate the origins; (ii) examine relationships of the theory's concepts; (iii) assess the logic of the theory's structure; (iv) consider the usefulness to practice; (v) judge the generalizability; (vi) evaluate the parsimony; and (vii) appraise the testability of the theory.
Human needs theory in nursing and Maslow's Hierarchy of Need Theory prompted this theory's development. The DH HNCM depicts four concepts based on the paradigm concepts of the profession: client, health/oral health, environment and dental hygiene actions, and includes validated eleven human needs that evolved overtime to eight. It is logical, simplistic, allows scientific predictions and testing, and provides a unique lens for the dental hygiene practitioner. With this model, dental hygienists have entered practice, knowing they enable clients to meet their human needs.
For the DH HNCM, theory analysis affirmed that the model is reasonable and insightful and adds to the dental hygiene professions' epistemology and ontology.
理论提供了一种关于概念关系、实践复杂性和直觉的结构性认识,从而塑造了专业的独特主体。捕捉认识和存在的方式对于任何专业的实践、教育和研究都是至关重要的。这个过程定义了专业的现象——它的存在或经验。理论评价是对特定理论的一种基于系统标准的评估。本研究对口腔保健人类需求概念模型(DH HNCM)进行了理论分析。
使用 Walker 和 Avant 理论分析,一个七步的过程,对 DH HNCM 进行了分析和评估,以确定其对口腔保健的意义和贡献。这些步骤包括:(i)调查理论的起源;(ii)检查理论概念之间的关系;(iii)评估理论结构的逻辑;(iv)考虑理论在实践中的实用性;(v)判断理论的可推广性;(vi)评估理论的简约性;(vii)评估理论的可检验性。
护理中的人类需求理论和马斯洛的需求层次理论促使了这一理论的发展。DH HNCM 基于专业的范式概念描述了四个概念:客户、健康/口腔健康、环境和口腔保健行动,并包括经过验证的十一个人类需求,这些需求随着时间的推移演变为八个。它具有逻辑性、简洁性、允许科学预测和测试,并为口腔保健从业者提供了独特的视角。通过这个模型,口腔保健师进入实践,知道他们能够帮助客户满足他们的人类需求。
对于 DH HNCM,理论分析肯定了该模型是合理的、有见地的,并为口腔保健专业的认识论和本体论增添了内容。