Suppr超能文献

胸腰椎骨折患者后路植入物取出术:长期结果

Posterior implant removal in patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures: long-term results.

作者信息

Smits A J, den Ouden L, Jonkergouw A, Deunk J, Bloemers F W

机构信息

Department of Traumasurgery, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, room 7F020, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2017 May;26(5):1525-1534. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4883-8. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Debate remains whether posterior implants after thoracolumbar spine fracture stabilization should be removed routinely or only in symptomatic cases. Implant related problems might be resolved or even prevented but removal includes secondary risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, patient satisfaction and quality of life after implant removal.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed concerning 102 patients that underwent posterior implant removal after stabilization of a traumatic thoracolumbar fracture between 2003 and 2015. Patients were invited to fill in SF-36, EQ-5D and RMDQ questionnaires after implant removal. Additionally, questions concerning satisfaction were presented. Cobb angles before and after removal were measured and in- or decrease of symptoms was gathered from hospital charts.

RESULTS

Mean age at removal was 38 years and time from implant removal to questionnaire was approximately 7 years, 62 patients filled in the questionnaires. Complications were present in 8% and quality of life was reported as fairly good. Patients had less back pain related disability compared to chronic low back pain patients. After removal there was a kyphosis increase which did not correspond with worsened clinical outcome. Removal decreased most symptoms and even asymptomatic patients reported benefit in most cases. An increase of symptoms after removal was reported in 11% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Implant removal is generally safe and provides high patient satisfaction. Overall, patients have a fairly good quality of life. Most symptomatic and asymptomatic patients report benefit from removal. However, low risks of complications and increase of symptoms have to be weighted for individual patients.

摘要

目的

对于胸腰椎骨折稳定术后的后路植入物,是应常规取出还是仅在出现症状时取出,目前仍存在争议。植入物相关问题或许能够得到解决甚至预防,但取出操作存在二次风险。本研究的目的是评估植入物取出后的安全性、患者满意度和生活质量。

方法

对2003年至2015年间因创伤性胸腰椎骨折稳定术后接受后路植入物取出的102例患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。在植入物取出后,邀请患者填写SF - 36、EQ - 5D和RMDQ问卷。此外,还提出了有关满意度的问题。测量了取出前后的Cobb角,并从医院病历中收集症状的改善或加重情况。

结果

取出时的平均年龄为38岁,从植入物取出到填写问卷的时间约为7年,62例患者填写了问卷。并发症发生率为8%,生活质量报告为相当好。与慢性下腰痛患者相比,患者的背痛相关残疾较少。取出后后凸畸形增加,但这与临床结果恶化并不相符。取出后大多数症状减轻,甚至无症状患者在大多数情况下也报告有获益。11%的患者报告取出后症状加重。

结论

植入物取出总体上是安全的,患者满意度高。总体而言,患者生活质量相当好。大多数有症状和无症状的患者都报告从取出中获益。然而,对于个体患者,必须权衡并发症风险低和症状加重的情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验