• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童非甾体抗炎药超敏反应诊断与分类中的差异

Discrepancies in the diagnosis and classification of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity reactions in children.

作者信息

Arikoglu Tuğba, Aslan Gulen, Yildirim Didem Derici, Batmaz Sehra Birgul, Kuyucu Semanur

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Mersin University, Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.

Department of Pediatrics, Baypark Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Allergol Int. 2017 Jul;66(3):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.alit.2016.10.004
PMID:27865769
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently encountered in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the confirmation rates, risk factors of NSAID hypersensitivity in children and to try to classify them with a standardized diagnostic protocol.

METHODS

All patients with a suspicion of NSAID-induced hypersensitivity were evaluated with European Network for drug Allergy (ENDA) recommendations. The children were classified as selective responders (SRs) or cross-intolerant (CI) depending on the drug provocation test (DPT) results.

RESULTS

We evaluated 106 children with a suspicion of NSAID hypersensitivity. NSAID hypersensitivity was confirmed with tests in 31 patients; 4 (12.9%) were diagnosed by skin tests and 27 (87.1%) by DPTs and two patients with a history of anaphylaxis by medical records. Eleven patients (33.3%) were classified as SRs, whereas twenty-two (66.6%) children as CIs. SRs and CIs were further classified as NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema (n = 8), NSAID-exacerbated cutaneous disease (n = 6) and NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (n = 1) and single NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema and/or anaphylaxis (n = 11). Eight (24.2%) patients could not be categorized according to ENDA/GALEN classification; one CI patient could not be classified based on pathomechanisms, seven CIs could not be categorized based on the underlying disease and clinical manifestations. A reaction within an hour of drug intake (aOR:3.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-7.67, p = 0.021), a history with multiple NSAIDs hypersensitivity (aOR:2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-7.60, p = 0.022), and family history of atopy (aOR:4.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-10.82, p = 0.006) were found as the independent risk factors related to confirmed NSAID hypersensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests the presence of different phenotypes which do not fit into the current classifications in children with NSAID hypersensitivity.

摘要

背景

非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)超敏反应在日常临床实践中经常遇到。本研究的目的是确定儿童NSAIDs超敏反应的确诊率、危险因素,并尝试用标准化诊断方案对其进行分类。

方法

所有疑似NSAIDs诱导超敏反应的患者均按照欧洲药物过敏网络(ENDA)的建议进行评估。根据药物激发试验(DPT)结果,将儿童分为选择性反应者(SRs)或交叉不耐受者(CI)。

结果

我们评估了106例疑似NSAIDs超敏反应的儿童。31例患者经检测确诊为NSAIDs超敏反应;4例(12.9%)通过皮肤试验确诊,27例(87.1%)通过DPT确诊,2例有过敏反应病史的患者通过病历确诊。11例患者(33.3%)被分类为SRs,而22例(66.6%)儿童被分类为CIs。SRs和CIs进一步分为NSAIDs诱导的荨麻疹/血管性水肿(n = 8)、NSAIDs加重的皮肤病(n = 6)和NSAIDs加重的呼吸道疾病(n = 1)以及单一NSAIDs诱导的荨麻疹/血管性水肿和/或过敏反应(n = 11)。8例(24.2%)患者无法根据ENDA/GALEN分类进行归类;1例CI患者无法根据发病机制进行分类,7例CI患者无法根据基础疾病和临床表现进行归类。药物摄入后1小时内出现反应(调整后比值比:3.0,95%置信区间:1.18 - 7.67,p = 0.021)、有多种NSAIDs超敏反应病史(调整后比值比:2.9,95%置信区间:1.16 - 7.60,p = 0.022)以及特应性家族史(调整后比值比:4.0,95%置信区间:1.50 - 10.82,p = 0.006)被发现是与确诊的NSAIDs超敏反应相关的独立危险因素。

结论

本研究表明,NSAIDs超敏反应儿童中存在不符合当前分类的不同表型。

相似文献

1
Discrepancies in the diagnosis and classification of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity reactions in children.儿童非甾体抗炎药超敏反应诊断与分类中的差异
Allergol Int. 2017 Jul;66(3):418-424. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
2
Different Phenotypes of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Hypersensitivity during Childhood.儿童期非甾体抗炎药超敏反应的不同表型
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;167(3):211-21. doi: 10.1159/000438992. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
3
Evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs according to the latest classification.根据最新分类评估非甾体抗炎药的过敏反应。
Allergy. 2015 Nov;70(11):1461-7. doi: 10.1111/all.12689. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity among children.儿童非甾体抗炎药超敏反应
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):386-93. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3858.
5
Immediate Reactions to More Than 1 NSAID Must Not Be Considered Cross-Hypersensitivity Unless Tolerance to ASA Is Verified.除非对阿司匹林的耐受性得到证实,否则对一种以上非甾体抗炎药的即刻反应不应被视为交叉过敏。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2017;27(1):32-39. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0080.
6
Early presentation with angioedema and urticaria in cross-reactive hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs among young, Asian, atopic children.亚洲特应性体质的年轻儿童对非甾体抗炎药交叉反应性超敏反应中血管性水肿和荨麻疹的早期表现
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e675-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0969. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
7
Hypersensitivity to Ibuprofen: Real-Life Experience in Children with History of Suspected Immediate Reactions.布洛芬过敏:疑似即刻反应史儿童的真实临床经验。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2023;184(1):33-42. doi: 10.1159/000526981. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
8
Approaches to the diagnosis and management of patients with a history of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related urticaria and angioedema.非甾体抗炎药相关性荨麻疹和血管性水肿患者的诊断和管理方法。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Aug;136(2):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.021.
9
Provocation tests with the offending nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with urticaria/angioedema reactions.在荨麻疹/血管性水肿反应患者中进行致过敏的非甾体抗炎药激发试验。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):421-6. doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3590.
10
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs among Adults: Clinical Features and Risk Factors for Diagnosis Confirmation.成人对非甾体抗炎药的超敏反应:临床特征及确诊的危险因素
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016;171(3-4):269-275. doi: 10.1159/000452627. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Updating the classification and routine diagnosis of NSAID hypersensitivity reactions: A WAO Statement.更新非甾体抗炎药超敏反应的分类与常规诊断:世界变态反应组织声明
World Allergy Organ J. 2025 Aug 12;18(8):101086. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101086. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Risk factors for drug hypersensitivity reactions in children.儿童药物过敏反应的危险因素。
Ital J Pediatr. 2024 Jul 15;50(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13052-024-01694-x.
3
Diagnostic evaluation of hypersensitivity reactions to arylpropionic acid derivatives: a descriptive observational study focusing on clinical characteristics and potential risk factors in children.
芳香基丙酸衍生物过敏反应的诊断评估:一项描述性观察研究,重点关注儿童的临床特征和潜在危险因素。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec;46(6):1294-1306. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01756-4. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity in a pediatric severe asthmatic population.非甾体抗炎药过敏在儿童严重哮喘人群中的表现。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 Oct;58(10):2983-2986. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26618. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
5
NSAID Hypersensitivity in the Pediatric Population: Classification and Diagnostic Strategies.儿科人群中的非甾体抗炎药超敏反应:分类与诊断策略
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Sep 28;15:1383-1399. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S267005. eCollection 2022.
6
Efficacy and Safety of NSAIDs in Infants: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature of the Past 20 Years.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)在婴儿中的疗效和安全性:对过去 20 年文献的综合回顾。
Paediatr Drugs. 2022 Nov;24(6):603-655. doi: 10.1007/s40272-022-00514-1. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
7
NSAID-induced reactions: classification, prevalence, impact, and management strategies.非甾体抗炎药引起的反应:分类、患病率、影响及管理策略。
J Asthma Allergy. 2019 Aug 8;12:217-233. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S164806. eCollection 2019.
8
Pediatric Drug Hypersensitivity.儿童药物过敏反应。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2019 Feb 22;19(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11882-019-0841-y.
9
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug hypersensitivity in the Asia-Pacific.亚太地区的非甾体抗炎药超敏反应
Asia Pac Allergy. 2018 Oct 23;8(4):e38. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2018.8.e38. eCollection 2018 Oct.
10
Pro and Contra: Provocation Tests in Drug Hypersensitivity.支持与反对:药物超敏反应中的激发试验
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Jul 4;18(7):1437. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071437.