Suppr超能文献

使用牙线和刷牙在减少牙间隙出血方面的比较效果。

Comparative effectiveness of flossing and brushing in reducing interproximal bleeding.

作者信息

Graves R C, Disney J A, Stamm J W

机构信息

Department of Dental Ecology, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1989 May;60(5):243-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1989.60.5.243.

Abstract

This study assesses the comparative effectiveness of three types of dental floss and toothbrushing in reducing interproximal bleeding sites, measured by stimulation with wooden interdental cleaners using the interdental bleeding index assessment method. The 119 adult subjects with gingival inflammation were randomly assigned to one of four groups at the beginning of a supervised 2 week clinical trial. The toothbrushing only group achieved a 35% reduction in bleeding sites and the three flossing groups all demonstrated dramatic reductions of about 67%. The three varieties of dental flosses were about equally effective in reducing interproximal bleeding and doubly effective as toothbrushing alone. Compared to probing, the interdental bleeding index method is considered a simplified method of assessing interproximal gingival inflammation.

摘要

本研究采用牙间出血指数评估方法,通过用木质牙间清洁器刺激来测量,评估三种牙线和刷牙在减少牙间出血部位方面的相对有效性。在一项为期2周的有监督的临床试验开始时,119名患有牙龈炎症的成年受试者被随机分配到四组中的一组。仅刷牙组的出血部位减少了35%,而三个使用牙线组均显示出约67%的显著减少。三种牙线在减少牙间出血方面效果大致相同,且效果是单独刷牙的两倍。与探诊相比,牙间出血指数法被认为是评估牙间牙龈炎症的一种简化方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验