• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙间隙卫生指数——一种用于患者评估和激励的两用工具提案。

Interdental hygiene index - A proposal of dual-purpose tool for patient assessment and motivation.

作者信息

Subramanya Ashwin Parakkaje, Prabhuji Munivenkatappa Lakshmaiah Venkatesh

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sir MVIT Campus, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):532-537. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_852_20. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

DOI:10.4103/jisp.jisp_852_20
PMID:34898920
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8603800/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interdental areas are more prone to plaque accumulation, thereby increasing the susceptibility for periodontal diseases. Proper method of interdental hygiene assessment and motivation to use interdental aids can potentially reduce the burden of periodontal diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive volunteer participants who presented with gingival inflammation were recruited based on the set of inclusion criteria. Further, proposed interdental hygiene index (IDHI) and gingival index were recorded by the examiner. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded on the baseline and 4-week follow-up visits. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The study comprised 50 participants with 22 male and 23 female participants. At baseline, the mean/standard deviation of IDHI was 1.32 ± 0.10 and 0.62 ± 0.21 on follow-up, respectively. For Gingival Index (GI) at baseline, the mean/standard deviation was 1.61 ± 0.15 and 0.70 ± 0.24 on follow-up, respectively. Correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between IDHI and GI at baseline and follow-up. Majority of the participants scored 0 on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, rated "Good" for acceptability of procedure and perceived efficacy of interdental brush. Participants reported to have acquired "High level of motivation" to use an interdental brush.

CONCLUSION

IDHI is a simple and reliable tool to assess the interdental areas of the patient and motivate to use interdental brush for the maintenance of good oral hygiene. PROMs also revealed positive responses from participants.

摘要

背景

牙间隙区域更容易积聚牙菌斑,从而增加患牙周疾病的易感性。正确的牙间隙卫生评估方法以及使用牙间隙清洁辅助工具的积极性可能会减轻牙周疾病的负担。

材料与方法

根据纳入标准招募了50名连续的牙龈炎症志愿者参与者。此外,检查者记录了提议的牙间隙卫生指数(IDHI)和牙龈指数。在基线和4周随访时记录患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)。进行了描述性统计和相关性分析。

结果

该研究包括50名参与者,其中男性22名,女性23名。基线时,IDHI的平均值/标准差分别为1.32±0.10,随访时为0.62±0.21。牙龈指数(GI)在基线时的平均值/标准差分别为1.61±0.15,随访时为0.70±0.24。相关性分析显示,基线和随访时IDHI与GI之间存在显著相关性。大多数参与者在疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)上得分为0,对操作的可接受性和牙间隙刷的感知效果评为“良好”。参与者报告称使用牙间隙刷获得了“高度积极性”。

结论

IDHI是一种简单可靠的工具,可用于评估患者的牙间隙区域,并激励患者使用牙间隙刷来维持良好的口腔卫生。PROMs也显示出参与者的积极反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/c3329861282d/JISP-25-532-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/e4affeca0adb/JISP-25-532-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/b9a273559b56/JISP-25-532-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/09550d9ae41f/JISP-25-532-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/c3329861282d/JISP-25-532-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/e4affeca0adb/JISP-25-532-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/b9a273559b56/JISP-25-532-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/09550d9ae41f/JISP-25-532-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7291/8603800/c3329861282d/JISP-25-532-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Interdental hygiene index - A proposal of dual-purpose tool for patient assessment and motivation.牙间隙卫生指数——一种用于患者评估和激励的两用工具提案。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2021 Nov-Dec;25(6):532-537. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_852_20. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Interdental Brush and Interdental Floss in Orthodontics Patients From Vidarbha Region: An Interventional Study.比达尔巴地区正畸患者使用牙间隙刷和牙线清洁效果的比较评估:一项干预性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 29;15(9):e46191. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46191. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Comparative evaluation of efficacy and patient-reported outcome measures of oral hygiene instruction methods for calibrated interdental brush.校准牙间刷口腔卫生指导方法疗效及患者报告结局指标的比较评价。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2021 Aug;19(3):287-294. doi: 10.1111/idh.12530. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
4
Home use of interdental cleaning devices and toothbrushing and their role in disease prevention.牙间隙清洁装置的家庭使用及刷牙及其在疾病预防中的作用。
Evid Based Dent. 2019 Dec;20(4):103-104. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0069-7.
5
Comparison of marginal bleeding using a periodontal probe or an interdental brush as indicators of gingivitis.使用牙周探针或牙间隙刷作为牙龈炎指标的边缘出血比较。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2011 Aug;9(3):211-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2010.00483.x. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
6
Efficacy of straight versus angled interdental brushes on interproximal tooth cleaning: a randomized controlled trial.直型与角度型邻间牙刷对邻面牙齿清洁效果的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2014 May;12(2):152-7. doi: 10.1111/idh.12042. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
7
Comparison Between Two Interproximal Cleaning Procedures in Periodontitis Patients: A Six-month, Single-blind, Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.牙周炎患者两种邻面清洁方法的比较:一项为期6个月的单盲随机对照临床试验。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015;13(3):205-11. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a32680.
8
Effect of interdental brush design on plaque during nonsurgical periodontal therapy.不同牙间刷设计在非手术牙周治疗期间对菌斑的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03337-x. Epub 2020 May 27.
9
Comparison between manual and mechanical methods of interproximal hygiene.牙间隙清洁的手动方法与机械方法的比较。
Quintessence Int. 1999 Aug;30(8):535-9.
10
Efficacy of interdental calibrated brushes on bleeding reduction in adults: a 3-month randomized controlled clinical trial.成人使用牙间校准刷减少出血的疗效:一项为期3个月的随机对照临床试验。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2016 Dec;124(6):566-571. doi: 10.1111/eos.12302. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Concordance and Clinical Outcomes Improvement Following Oral Hygiene Motivation: A Systematic Review and Report of the Workshop of the Italian Societies of Dental Hygiene.口腔卫生激励后的一致性与临床结局改善:意大利口腔卫生学会研讨会的系统评价与报告
Int J Dent. 2024 Oct 16;2024:8592336. doi: 10.1155/2024/8592336. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Inflammation of the Gums.牙龈发炎
Malays Fam Physician. 2020 Mar 18;15(1):71-73. eCollection 2020.
2
A network meta-analysis of interproximal oral hygiene methods in the reduction of clinical indices of inflammation.一项关于邻面口腔卫生方法在减轻炎症临床指标方面的网络荟萃分析。
J Periodontol. 2018 May;89(5):558-570. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0368.
3
The Bleeding on Brushing Index: a novel index in preventive dentistry.刷牙出血指数:预防牙科的一种新指标。
Int Dent J. 2017 Oct;67(5):299-307. doi: 10.1111/idj.12300. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Efficacy of interdental calibrated brushes on bleeding reduction in adults: a 3-month randomized controlled clinical trial.成人使用牙间校准刷减少出血的疗效:一项为期3个月的随机对照临床试验。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2016 Dec;124(6):566-571. doi: 10.1111/eos.12302. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
Access to Interdental Brushing in Periodontal Healthy Young Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.牙周健康的年轻成年人使用牙间隙刷的情况:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2016 May 18;11(5):e0155467. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155467. eCollection 2016.
6
A Colorimetric Interdental Probe as a Standard Method to Evaluate Interdental Efficiency of Interdental Brush.一种比色法牙间隙探针作为评估牙间隙刷牙间隙清洁效果的标准方法。
Open Dent J. 2015 Dec 23;9:431-7. doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010431. eCollection 2015.
7
Establishment of a new marginal plaque index with high sensitivity for changes in oral hygiene.建立一种对口腔卫生变化具有高敏感性的新型边缘菌斑指数。
J Periodontol. 2014 Dec;85(12):1730-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140285.
8
Periodontal Research: Basics and beyond - Part III (Data presentation, statistical testing, interpretation and writing of a report).牙周病研究:基础及拓展 - 第三部分(数据呈现、统计检验、结果解读与报告撰写)
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013 Sep;17(5):577-82. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.119293.
9
Examiner alignment and assessment in clinical periodontal research.临床牙周研究中的检查者一致性和评估。
Periodontol 2000. 2012 Jun;59(1):41-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00436.x.
10
Biofilms: A microbial home.生物膜:微生物的家园。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011 Apr;15(2):111-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.84377.