Anderson Travis J, Althausen Peter L
*Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA; and †Reno Orthopaedic Clinic, Reno, NV.
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Dec;30 Suppl 5:S3-S6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000712.
Over the past few years, the United States has seen the rapid growth of dedicated musculoskeletal urgent care centers owned and operated by individual orthopaedic practices. In June of 2014, our practice opened the first dedicated orthopaedic urgent care in the region staffed by physician assistants and supervised by orthopaedic surgeons. Our hypothesis is that such centers can safely improve orthopaedic care for ambulatory orthopaedic injuries, decrease volume for overburdened emergency departments (EDs), reduce wait times and significantly decrease the cost of care while improving access to orthopaedic specialists.
Retrospective review.
Level 2 trauma center and physician-owned orthopaedic urgent care.
Consecutive series of patients seen in the hospital ED (n = 87,629) and orthopaedic urgent care (n = 12,722).
None.
ED wait time, total visit time, time until being seen by provider, time until consultation with orthopaedic surgeon, total visit charges, and effect on orthopaedic practice revenue.
During the 12 months of study, 12,722 patients were treated in our urgent care. The average urgent care wait time until being seen by a provider was 17 minutes compared with 45 minutes in hospital ED. Total visit time was 43 minutes in the urgent care and 156 minutes in the hospital ED. Time to being seen by an orthopaedic specialist was 1.2 days for urgent care patients compared with 3.4 days for ED patients. The average charge for an urgent care visit was $461 compared with $8150 in hospital ED. During the course of study, urgent care treatment reduced charges to health care system by $97,819,458. Hospital ED orthopaedic volume did decrease as expected but total ED patient volume remained the same. There was no measureable effect on hospital ED wait times. Hospital surgical case volume did not change over the period of study and the orthopaedic census remained stable. Urgent care construction, marketing, administration, imaging, and labor costs totaled $1,664,445. Urgent care revenue from evaluation and management, imaging, durable medical equipment, and casting totaled $2,577,707. Practice revenue from follow-up care of patients who entered practice through the urgent care totaled $7,657,998.
Dedicated musculoskeletal urgent care clinics operated by orthopaedic surgery practices can be extremely beneficial to patients, physicians, and the health care system. They clearly improve access to care, whereas significantly decreasing overall health care costs for patients with ambulatory orthopaedic conditions and injuries. In addition, they can be financially beneficial to both patients and orthopaedic surgeons alike without cannibalizing local hospital surgical volumes.
Therapeutic Level III.
在过去几年中,美国由个体骨科诊所拥有和运营的专门的肌肉骨骼紧急护理中心迅速发展。2014年6月,我们的诊所开设了该地区第一家由医师助理配备并由骨科医生监督的专门骨科紧急护理中心。我们的假设是,此类中心可以安全地改善门诊骨科损伤的骨科护理,减少负担过重的急诊科(ED)的就诊量,减少等待时间,并显著降低护理成本,同时改善患者获得骨科专家诊治的机会。
回顾性研究。
二级创伤中心和医师拥有的骨科紧急护理中心。
在医院急诊科就诊的连续系列患者(n = 87,629)和骨科紧急护理中心就诊的患者(n = 12,722)。
无。
急诊等待时间、总就诊时间、见到提供者的时间、与骨科医生会诊的时间、总就诊费用以及对骨科诊所收入的影响。
在研究的12个月期间,我们的紧急护理中心共治疗了12,722名患者。紧急护理中心患者见到提供者的平均等待时间为17分钟,而医院急诊科为45分钟。紧急护理中心的总就诊时间为43分钟,医院急诊科为156分钟。紧急护理中心患者见到骨科专家的时间为1.2天,而急诊科患者为3.4天。紧急护理中心一次就诊的平均费用为461美元,而医院急诊科为8150美元。在研究过程中,紧急护理治疗使医疗保健系统的费用减少了97,819,458美元。医院急诊科的骨科就诊量确实如预期那样减少了,但急诊科的总患者就诊量保持不变。对医院急诊科的等待时间没有可测量的影响。在研究期间,医院的手术病例量没有变化,骨科普查保持稳定。紧急护理中心的建设、营销、管理、影像检查和劳动力成本总计1,664,445美元。紧急护理中心在评估与管理、影像检查、耐用医疗设备和石膏固定方面的收入总计2,577,707美元。通过紧急护理中心进入诊所的患者的后续护理诊所收入总计7,657,998美元。
由骨外科诊所运营的专门肌肉骨骼紧急护理诊所对患者、医生和医疗保健系统可能极为有益。它们明显改善了就医机会,同时显著降低了门诊骨科疾病和损伤患者的总体医疗保健成本。此外,它们对患者和骨科医生在经济上都有益,且不会影响当地医院的手术量。
治疗性三级证据。