Heindel Jerrold J, Skalla Lesley A, Joubert Bonnie R, Dilworth Caroline H, Gray Kimberly A
Division of Extramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, RTP NC 27709, United States.
MDB Inc. Durham NC, United States.
Reprod Toxicol. 2017 Mar;68:34-48. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) scientific field investigates the influence of early life environmental stressors on later life health outcomes. Environmental chemical exposures are a particular focus area within this field. Although the DOHaD hypothesis originated in the 1990s, the data evaluating this hypothesis in environmental epidemiology has not been comprehensively summarized. We conducted a scoping literature review to describe the human evidence for the DOHaD hypothesis and to identify, 1) where there may be reasonable data to draw conclusions, and 2) areas warranting further research. Using PubMed and Web of Science we identified 425 publications through 2014 that met our criteria for evaluating the DOHaD hypothesis in environmental epidemiology. These publications covered 60 different chemicals. The majority of publications focused on neurological/cognitive outcomes, followed by cancer, and respiratory outcomes. We note areas ready for more detailed review, those requiring more data and ideas for future directions.
健康与疾病的发育起源(DOHaD)科学领域研究早期生活环境应激源对后期生活健康结果的影响。环境化学物质暴露是该领域的一个特别关注领域。尽管DOHaD假说起源于20世纪90年代,但评估该假说的环境流行病学数据尚未得到全面总结。我们进行了一项范围界定文献综述,以描述支持DOHaD假说的人类证据,并确定:1)哪些地方可能有合理的数据得出结论;2)需要进一步研究的领域。通过PubMed和科学网,我们在2014年之前共识别出425篇符合我们在环境流行病学中评估DOHaD假说标准的出版物。这些出版物涵盖了60种不同的化学物质。大多数出版物关注神经/认知结果,其次是癌症和呼吸结果。我们指出了准备进行更详细综述的领域、那些需要更多数据的领域以及未来方向的思路。