An Donggun, Runco Mark A
Center for Learning Science and Creative Talent Development, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Eur J Psychol. 2016 Nov 18;12(4):523-532. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i4.1132. eCollection 2016 Nov.
The general objective of this study was to reexamine two views of creativity, one positing that there is a general creative capacity or talent and the other that creativity is domain-specific. These two views were compared by (a) testing correlations among measures of domain-general and domain-specific creativity and (b) examining how the general and the specific measures was each related to indices of knowledge, motivation, and personality. Participants were 147 college students enrolled in a foreign language course. Data were collected on participants' domain knowledge, motivation, and creative personality, as well as four measures representing "General or Domain-Specific Creative Ideation" or "Creative Performance and Activity". Results indicated that the four measures of creativity were correlated with one another, except for "General Performance and Activity" and "Domain-Specific Ideation." A canonical correlation indicated that knowledge, motivation, and personality were significantly correlated with the four creativity measures (Rc = .49, p < .01). Multiple regressions uncovered particular relationships consistent with the view that creativity has both general and domain-specific contributions. Limitations, such as the focus on one domain, and future directions are discussed.
本研究的总体目标是重新审视关于创造力的两种观点,一种观点认为存在一种通用的创造能力或天赋,另一种观点认为创造力是特定领域的。通过以下方式对这两种观点进行比较:(a) 测试通用领域和特定领域创造力测量指标之间的相关性;(b) 考察通用测量指标和特定测量指标分别与知识、动机和人格指标之间的关系。参与者为147名选修外语课程的大学生。收集了参与者的领域知识、动机和创造性人格数据,以及代表 “通用或特定领域创造性思维” 或 “创造性表现与活动” 的四项测量指标数据。结果表明,除了 “通用表现与活动” 和 “特定领域思维” 外,四项创造力测量指标之间相互关联。典型相关分析表明,知识、动机和人格与四项创造力测量指标显著相关(Rc = .49,p < .01)。多元回归分析发现了一些特定关系,这些关系与创造力具有通用和特定领域贡献的观点一致。文中讨论了本研究的局限性,如仅关注一个领域,并指出了未来的研究方向。