Hon Ying, Chen Guo-Zhen, Lu Shu-Hao, Lam David C C, Lam Andrew K C
School of Optometry, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Jan;37(1):42-50. doi: 10.1111/opo.12335. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
To compare corneal tangent moduli between low and high myopes.
Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) of 32 low and 32 high myopes were obtained using an Ocular Response Analyzer, followed by a corneal indentation device that measured corneal stiffness. Corneal topography, pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry intraocular pressure (GAT-IOP), and corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) were also obtained. Corneal tangent modulus was calculated on the basis of corneal stiffness, central corneal thickness and corneal radius. Comparisons between groups and associations between corneal biomechanical and ocular parameters were performed.
Corneal tangent moduli were positively correlated with GAT-IOP (R = 0.078, p = 0.025), and IOPcc (R = 0.12, p = 0.006). Despite similarity in corneal thickness and radius, high myopes exhibited a significantly higher IOPcc (16.4 ± 2.51 mmHg) than low myopes (13.1 ± 1.96 mmHg; t(62) = -5.57, p < 0.0001). Both groups had similar corneal stiffness (0.063 ± 0.0085 and 0.063 ± 0.0079 N mm for low and high myopes, respectively) and CRF (9.6 ± 1.58 and 9.5 ± 1.90 mmHg for low and high myopes, respectively). Moreover, high myopes exhibited a significantly lower CH (9.5 ± 1.51 mmHg) than low myopes (10.6 ± 1.38 mmHg; t(62) = 2.92, p = 0.005). After normalising corneal tangent moduli to the mean intraocular pressure in normal eyes (15.5 mmHg) using IOPcc, high myopes showed a significantly lower corneal tangent moduli (0.47 ± 0.087 MPa) than low myopes (0.57 ± 0.099 MPa; t(62) = 4.17, p < 0.0001).
High myopes had lower normalised corneal tangent moduli than low myopes, which indicated that their corneas were less stiff. This is the first in vivo study comparing elastic moduli of the cornea in different refractive groups. Further studies are warranted to understand whether a less stiff cornea is a cause for or an outcome from myopia development.
比较低度近视和高度近视患者的角膜切线模量。
使用眼反应分析仪测量32例低度近视和32例高度近视患者的角膜滞后量(CH)和角膜阻力因子(CRF),随后使用角膜压痕装置测量角膜硬度。还获取了角膜地形图、角膜厚度、Goldmann压平眼压计测量的眼压(GAT-IOP)和角膜补偿眼压(IOPcc)。根据角膜硬度、中央角膜厚度和角膜半径计算角膜切线模量。进行组间比较以及角膜生物力学参数与眼部参数之间的相关性分析。
角膜切线模量与GAT-IOP(R = 0.078,p = 0.025)和IOPcc(R = 0.12,p = 0.006)呈正相关。尽管角膜厚度和半径相似,但高度近视患者的IOPcc(16.4±2.51 mmHg)显著高于低度近视患者(13.1±1.96 mmHg;t(62)= -5.57,p < 0.0001)。两组的角膜硬度相似(低度近视和高度近视患者分别为0.063±0.0085和0.063±0.0079 N/mm),CRF也相似(低度近视和高度近视患者分别为9.6±1.58和9.5±1.90 mmHg)。此外,高度近视患者的CH(9.5±1.51 mmHg)显著低于低度近视患者(10.6±1.38 mmHg;t(62)= 2.92,p = 0.005)。使用IOPcc将角膜切线模量归一化至正常眼平均眼压(15.5 mmHg)后,高度近视患者的角膜切线模量(0.47±0.087 MPa)显著低于低度近视患者(0.57±0.099 MPa;t(62)= 4.17,p < 0.0001)。
高度近视患者的归一化角膜切线模量低于低度近视患者,这表明他们的角膜硬度较低。这是第一项在不同屈光组中比较角膜弹性模量的体内研究。有必要进一步研究以了解角膜硬度较低是近视发展的原因还是结果。