Yang Songshan, Cranford James A, Jester Jennifer M, Li Runze, Zucker Robert A, Buu Anne
Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.
Department of Psychiatry & Addiction Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.
Stat Med. 2017 Feb 28;36(5):827-837. doi: 10.1002/sim.7177. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
This study proposes a time-varying effect model for examining group differences in trajectories of zero-inflated count outcomes. The motivating example demonstrates that this zero-inflated Poisson model allows investigators to study group differences in different aspects of substance use (e.g., the probability of abstinence and the quantity of alcohol use) simultaneously. The simulation study shows that the accuracy of estimation of trajectory functions improves as the sample size increases; the accuracy under equal group sizes is only higher when the sample size is small (100). In terms of the performance of the hypothesis testing, the type I error rates are close to their corresponding significance levels under all settings. Furthermore, the power increases as the alternative hypothesis deviates more from the null hypothesis, and the rate of this increasing trend is higher when the sample size is larger. Moreover, the hypothesis test for the group difference in the zero component tends to be less powerful than the test for the group difference in the Poisson component. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
本研究提出了一种时变效应模型,用于检验零膨胀计数结果轨迹中的组间差异。激励性示例表明,这种零膨胀泊松模型使研究人员能够同时研究物质使用不同方面的组间差异(例如,戒酒概率和酒精使用量)。模拟研究表明,随着样本量的增加,轨迹函数估计的准确性提高;仅在样本量较小时(100),相等组大小下的准确性才更高。就假设检验的性能而言,在所有设置下,I型错误率都接近其相应的显著性水平。此外,随着备择假设与原假设的偏差越大,检验效能增加,且当样本量越大时,这种增加趋势的速率越高。此外,零分量组间差异的假设检验往往比泊松分量组间差异的检验效能更低。版权所有© 2016约翰威立父子有限公司。