Pemberton J M, Ellis P E, Pilkington J G, Bérénos C
Institute of Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Heredity (Edinb). 2017 Jan;118(1):64-77. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2016.100. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
Experimental studies often find that inbreeding depression is more severe in harsh environments, but the few studies of in situ wild populations available to date rarely find strong support for this effect. We investigated evidence for inbreeding depression by environment interactions in nine traits in the individually monitored Soay sheep population of St Kilda, using genomic inbreeding coefficients based on 37 037 single-nucleotide polymorphism loci, and population density as an axis of environmental variation. All traits showed variation with population density and all traits showed some evidence for depression because of either an individual's own inbreeding or maternal inbreeding. However, only six traits showed evidence for an interaction in the expected direction, and only two interactions were statistically significant. We identify three possible reasons why wild population studies may generally fail to find strong support for interactions between inbreeding depression and environmental variation compared with experimental studies. First, for species with biparental inbreeding only, the amount of observed inbreeding in natural populations is generally low compared with that used in experimental studies. Second, it is possible that experimental studies sometimes actually impose higher levels of stress than organisms experience in the wild. Third, some purging of the deleterious recessive alleles that underpin interaction effects may occur in the wild.
实验研究常常发现,近亲繁殖衰退在恶劣环境中更为严重,但迄今为止对野生种群的少数实地研究很少能有力支持这一效应。我们利用基于37037个单核苷酸多态性位点的基因组近亲繁殖系数,并将种群密度作为环境变异的一个轴,在圣基尔达岛单独监测的索艾羊种群中,研究了九个性状中近亲繁殖衰退与环境相互作用的证据。所有性状都随种群密度而变化,并且所有性状都显示出因个体自身近亲繁殖或母体近亲繁殖而出现衰退的一些证据。然而,只有六个性状显示出预期方向的相互作用证据,且只有两个相互作用具有统计学意义。我们确定了野生种群研究通常未能像实验研究那样有力支持近亲繁殖衰退与环境变异之间相互作用的三个可能原因。第一,对于仅进行双亲近亲繁殖的物种,自然种群中观察到的近亲繁殖程度与实验研究中使用的相比通常较低。第二,有可能实验研究有时实际上施加的压力水平比生物体在野外所经历的更高。第三,在野外可能会发生对支撑相互作用效应的有害隐性等位基因的一些清除。