Gurnani Ashita S, Gavett Brandon E
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, 1420 Austin Bluffs Parkway, Colorado Springs, CO, 80918, USA.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2017 Mar;27(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11065-016-9334-0. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
Differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) from normal aging and other dementia etiologies is imperative for disease specific treatment options and long-term care planning. Neuropathological confirmation is the gold standard for neurodegenerative disease diagnosis, yet most published studies examining the use of neuropsychological tests in the differential diagnosis of dementia rely upon clinical diagnostic outcomes. The present study undertook a meta-analytic review of the literature to identify cognitive tests and domains that allow for the differentiation of individuals with AD pathology from individuals with dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB) pathology and pathology-free individuals. A comprehensive literature search yielded 14 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the present meta-analysis. Six studies comprised 222 decedents with AD compared to 433 normal controls, and eight studies comprised 431 cases of AD compared to 155 decedents with DLB. Results revealed that the effect of having neuropathologically confirmed AD versus DLB lowered performance in the memory domain, and having DLB decreased performance in the visuospatial domain. No single test differed significantly across the AD and DLB groups. For the AD and pathology free comparison, results indicated that that AD was associated with poorer performance on the memory and language domains. With respect to specific cognitive tests, AD produced lower scores on list learning tests, category fluency, and the Digit Symbol substitution test. The limited number of studies meeting inclusion criteria warrants formulation of guidelines for reporting in clinico-pathological studies; suggested guidelines are provided.
将阿尔茨海默病(AD)与正常衰老及其他痴呆病因进行鉴别诊断,对于特定疾病的治疗方案和长期护理规划至关重要。神经病理学确诊是神经退行性疾病诊断的金标准,但大多数已发表的研究在痴呆鉴别诊断中使用神经心理学测试时,依赖的是临床诊断结果。本研究对文献进行了荟萃分析,以确定能够区分患有AD病理的个体与患有路易体痴呆(DLB)病理的个体以及无病理个体的认知测试和领域。全面的文献检索产生了14项符合本荟萃分析纳入标准的研究。6项研究纳入了222例患有AD的死者与433例正常对照,8项研究纳入了431例AD病例与155例患有DLB的死者。结果显示,经神经病理学确诊为AD与DLB相比,在记忆领域的表现会降低,而患有DLB则在视觉空间领域的表现会降低。AD组和DLB组之间没有单一测试存在显著差异。对于AD与无病理状态的比较,结果表明AD与在记忆和语言领域表现较差有关。关于特定的认知测试,AD在列表学习测试、类别流畅性测试和数字符号替换测试中得分较低。符合纳入标准的研究数量有限,因此有必要制定临床病理研究报告指南;文中提供了建议指南。