Tarzia Laura, May Carl, Hegarty Kelsey
Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, 200 Berkeley Street, Carlton, 3053, VIC, Australia.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0352-0.
Domestic violence shares many features with chronic disease, including ongoing physical and mental health problems and eroded self-efficacy. Given the challenges around help-seeking for women experiencing domestic violence, it is essential that they be given support to 'self-manage' their condition. The growing popularity of web-based applications for chronic disease self-management suggests that there may be opportunities to use them as an intervention strategy for women experiencing domestic violence, however, as yet, little is known about whether this might work in practice.
It is critical that interventions for domestic violence-whether web-based or otherwise-promote agency and capacity for action rather than adding to the 'workload' of already stressed and vulnerable women. Although randomised controlled trials are vital to determine the effectiveness of interventions, robust theoretical frameworks can complement them as a way of examining the feasibility of implementing an intervention in practice. To date, no such frameworks have been developed for the domestic violence context. Consequently, in this paper we propose that it may be useful to appraise interventions for domestic violence using frameworks developed to help understand the barriers and facilitators around self-management of chronic conditions. Using a case study of an online healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid developed in Australia (I-DECIDE), this paper adapts and applies two theories: Burden of Treatment Theory and Normalisation Process Theory, to assess whether the intervention might increase women's agency and capacity for action. In doing this, it proposes a new theoretical model with which the practical application of domestic violence interventions could be appraised in conjunction with other evaluation frameworks. This paper argues that theoretical frameworks for chronic disease are appropriate to assess the feasibility of implementing interventions for domestic violence in practice. The use of the modified Burden of Treatment/Normalisation Process Theory framework developed in this paper strengthens the case for I-DECIDE and other web-based applications as a way of supporting women experiencing domestic violence.
家庭暴力与慢性病有许多共同特征,包括持续的身心健康问题以及自我效能感的削弱。鉴于遭受家庭暴力的女性在寻求帮助方面面临诸多挑战,给予她们支持以“自我管理”自身状况至关重要。基于网络的慢性病自我管理应用程序越来越受欢迎,这表明有可能将其用作针对遭受家庭暴力女性的干预策略,然而,目前对于这种策略在实际中是否可行知之甚少。
对于家庭暴力的干预措施——无论是基于网络的还是其他形式的——促进行动能力和行动力至关重要,而不是增加已经压力重重且脆弱的女性的“负担”。虽然随机对照试验对于确定干预措施的有效性至关重要,但强大的理论框架可以作为一种补充,用于检验在实际中实施干预措施的可行性。迄今为止,尚未针对家庭暴力背景开发出此类框架。因此,在本文中我们提出,利用为帮助理解慢性病自我管理的障碍和促进因素而开发的框架来评估家庭暴力干预措施可能会有所帮助。通过对澳大利亚开发的一个在线健康关系工具和安全决策辅助工具(I - DECIDE)的案例研究,本文改编并应用了两种理论:治疗负担理论和正常化过程理论,以评估该干预措施是否可能增强女性的行动能力和行动力。在此过程中,本文提出了一个新的理论模型,可结合其他评估框架来评估家庭暴力干预措施的实际应用。本文认为,慢性病的理论框架适用于评估在实际中实施家庭暴力干预措施的可行性。本文开发的经修改的治疗负担/正常化过程理论框架的使用,强化了将I - DECIDE及其他基于网络的应用程序作为支持遭受家庭暴力女性的一种方式的理由。