Tarzia Laura, Valpied Jodie, Koziol-McLain Jane, Glass Nancy, Hegarty Kelsey
Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Centre for Interdisciplinary Trauma Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 28;19(3):e94. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7039.
The use of Web-based methods to deliver and evaluate interventions is growing in popularity, particularly in a health care context. They have shown particular promise in responding to sensitive or stigmatized issues such as mental health and sexually transmitted infections. In the field of domestic violence (DV), however, the idea of delivering and evaluating interventions via the Web is still relatively new. Little is known about how to successfully navigate several challenges encountered by the researchers while working in this area. This paper uses the case study of I-DECIDE, a Web-based healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing DV, developed in Australia. The I-DECIDE website has recently been evaluated through a randomized controlled trial, and we outline some of the methodological and ethical challenges encountered during recruitment, retention, and evaluation. We suggest that with careful consideration of these issues, randomized controlled trials can be safely conducted via the Web in this sensitive area.
利用基于网络的方法来提供和评估干预措施正日益受到欢迎,尤其是在医疗保健领域。它们在应对诸如心理健康和性传播感染等敏感或受污名化的问题方面显示出特别的前景。然而,在家庭暴力(DV)领域,通过网络提供和评估干预措施的想法仍然相对较新。对于如何成功应对研究人员在该领域工作时遇到的若干挑战,人们知之甚少。本文采用了I-DECIDE的案例研究,I-DECIDE是澳大利亚开发的一个基于网络的针对遭受家庭暴力的女性的健康关系工具和安全决策辅助工具。I-DECIDE网站最近通过一项随机对照试验进行了评估,我们概述了在招募、保留和评估过程中遇到的一些方法学和伦理挑战。我们建议,仔细考虑这些问题后,在这个敏感领域可以通过网络安全地进行随机对照试验。