Novick Laura R, Catley Kefyn M
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5721
Department of Biology, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC 28723.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 winter;15(4). doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-06-0127.
The ability to interpret and reason from Tree of Life (ToL) diagrams has become a vital component of science literacy in the 21st century. This article reports on the effectiveness of a research-based curriculum, including an instructional booklet, laboratory, and lectures, to teach the fundamentals of such tree thinking in an introductory biology class for science majors. We present the results of a study involving 117 undergraduates who received either our new research-based tree-thinking curriculum or business-as-usual instruction. We found greater gains in tree-thinking abilities for the experimental instruction group than for the business-as-usual group, as measured by performance on our novel assessment instrument. This was a medium size effect. These gains were observed on an unannounced test that was administered ∼5-6 weeks after the primary instruction in tree thinking. The nature of students' postinstruction difficulties with tree thinking suggests that the critical underlying concept for acquiring expert-level competence in this area is understanding that any specific phylogenetic tree is a subset of the complete, unimaginably large ToL.
在21世纪,解读生命之树(ToL)图表并从中进行推理的能力已成为科学素养的重要组成部分。本文报告了一项基于研究的课程的有效性,该课程包括一本教学手册、实验课和讲座,旨在向理科专业的生物学入门课程学生传授这种树形思维的基础知识。我们展示了一项研究的结果,该研究涉及117名本科生,他们要么接受了我们新的基于研究的树形思维课程,要么接受了常规教学。通过我们新颖的评估工具衡量,我们发现实验教学组在树形思维能力方面的提升比常规组更大。这是一个中等规模的效应。这些提升是在树形思维主要教学约5 - 6周后进行的一次未宣布的测试中观察到的。学生在教学后树形思维方面的困难性质表明,在这一领域获得专家级能力的关键潜在概念是理解任何特定的系统发育树都是完整的、大到难以想象的生命之树的一个子集。