Suppr超能文献

固定复方与自由联合抗高血压药物治疗持续性的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of therapy persistence for fixed versus free combination antihypertensives: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Grimmsmann Thomas, Himmel Wolfgang

机构信息

German Health Insurance Medical Service (MDK) Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Schwerin, Germany.

Department of General Practice, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 22;6(11):e011650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011650.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare therapy persistence among patients who started with one of three drug regimens: a monotherapy, or combination therapy either as a fixed combination (ie, 'single pill') or as a free combination (ie, two separate antihypertensive agents).

DESIGN

In a secondary data analysis, we used descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to measure the effect of the three therapy regimens on therapy persistence over 4 years.

SETTING

Prescription data from a large German statutory health insurance provider.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients who started with a new antihypertensive therapy in 2007 or 2008 (n=8032) were included and followed for 4 years.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Therapy persistence, defined as receiving a refill prescription no later than within 180 days.

RESULTS

The persistence rates after 4 years were nearly identical among patients who started with a monotherapy (40.3%) or a fixed combination of two drugs (39.8%). However, significantly more patients who started with free-drug combinations remained therapy persistent (56.4%), resulting in an OR of 2.00 (95% CI 1.6 to 2.5; p<0.0001) for free combinations versus fixed combinations. This trend was observed in all age groups and for men and women. At the end of the study period, the number of different antihypertensive agents was still similar between patients who started with a fixed combination (2.41) and patients who started with a free combination (2.28).

CONCLUSIONS

While single-pill combinations make it easier to take different drugs at once, the risk is high that these several substances are stopped at once. Therapy persistence was significantly better for patients who started with a free-drug combination without taking much fewer different antihypertensive drugs as those with a fixed combination.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较起始采用三种药物治疗方案之一的患者的治疗持续性,这三种方案分别为:单药治疗,或固定复方(即“单片”)联合治疗,或自由联合治疗(即两种单独的抗高血压药物)。

设计

在一项二次数据分析中,我们使用描述性统计和多变量逻辑回归来衡量这三种治疗方案对4年治疗持续性的影响。

背景

来自德国一家大型法定医疗保险机构的处方数据。

参与者

纳入所有在2007年或2008年开始新抗高血压治疗的患者(n = 8032),并随访4年。

主要结局指标

治疗持续性,定义为在不迟于180天内获得续方。

结果

起始采用单药治疗(40.3%)或两种药物固定复方治疗(39.8%)的患者4年后的持续性率几乎相同。然而,起始采用自由联合治疗的患者治疗持续性显著更高(56.4%),自由联合治疗与固定复方治疗相比的优势比为2.00(95%置信区间1.6至2.5;p<0.0001)。在所有年龄组以及男性和女性中均观察到这一趋势。在研究期末,起始采用固定复方治疗的患者与起始采用自由联合治疗的患者之间使用的不同抗高血压药物数量仍相似(分别为2.41种和2.28种)。

结论

虽然单片复方使同时服用不同药物变得更容易,但这些几种药物同时停用的风险很高。起始采用自由联合治疗的患者治疗持续性显著更好,且与采用固定复方治疗的患者相比,使用的不同抗高血压药物数量并没有少很多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/5128950/5338541dfd73/bmjopen2016011650f01.jpg

相似文献

2
[Medication adherence with the fixed combination of ramipril and amlodipine].
Orv Hetil. 2014 Nov 23;155(47):1882-8. doi: 10.1556/OH.2014.30037.
3
Effect of Combination Therapy on Adherence Among US Patients Initiating Therapy for Hypertension: a Cohort Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):619-625. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3972-z. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
5
6
Medication Adherence to Antihypertensive Triple-Combination Therapy Among Patients Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Jun;25(6):678-686. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.6.678.
9
[Low persistence of simvastatin and ezetimibe fixed combination in the lipid lowering therapy].
Orv Hetil. 2015 Jan 25;156(4):141-5. doi: 10.1556/OH.2015.30085.
10
A medication adherence and persistence comparison of hypertensive patients treated with single-, double- and triple-pill combination therapy.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2415-22. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.964853. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention is the key.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Jan 11;10(8):649-651. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae090.
2
Effect of a single pill concept on clinical and pharmacoeconomic outcomes in cardiovascular diseases.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2025 Jan 11;10(8):686-693. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae059.
5
Effect of patient and treatment factors on persistence with antihypertensive treatment: A population-based study.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0245610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245610. eCollection 2021.
6
Therapeutic Compliance of Patients with Arterial Hypertension in Primary Care.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Nov 22;56(11):631. doi: 10.3390/medicina56110631.
8
Fixed Versus Free Combinations Of Antihypertensive Drugs: Analyses Of Real-World Data Of Persistence With Therapy In Italy.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Nov 11;13:1961-1969. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S225444. eCollection 2019.
9
The impact of fixed-dose combination versus free-equivalent combination therapies on adherence for hypertension: a meta-analysis.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 May;20(5):902-907. doi: 10.1111/jch.13272. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
10
Starting a Fixed-Dose Combination Pill versus a Single Agent for Patients with Hypertension.
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):597-598. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4013-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Non-adherence to antihypertensive medication: The role of mental and physical comorbidity.
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;207:310-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.01.069. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
2
Antihypertensive Combination Treatment: State of the Art.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Jul;17(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0562-0.
6
Persistence of antihypertensive drug use in German primary care: a follow-up study based on pharmacy claims data.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;70(3):295-301. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1607-4. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Fixed-dose combination therapy in hypertension: cons.
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2012 Jun 1;19(2):51-4. doi: 10.1007/BF03262453.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验