Mu Yongxu, Yan Ruiqiang, He Junfeng, Hu Xiaoyan, Li Qiming, Liu Haiyan
Yongxu Mu, Department of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, 41 Linyin Road, Kun District, Baotou 014010, China.
Ruiqiang Yan, Department of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, 41 Linyin Road, Kun District, Baotou 014010, China.
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Sep-Oct;32(5):1082-1086. doi: 10.12669/pjms.325.10234.
To compare the effects of MRI- and CT-guided interventional therapies on uterine fibroids.
A total of 280 patients with uterine fibroids who were treated in our hospital from August 2008 to February 2014 were selected and divided into a treatment group and a control group by random draw (n=140). The control group and the treatment group were subjected to CT- and MRI-guided interventional therapies for uterine artery embolization.
After three months of treatment, 94.3% and 92.9% of heavy menstrual bleeding and pelvic pressure of the treatment group were relieved respectively, which were similar to those of the control group (92.9% and 92.1% respectively) (P>0.05). The two groups had similar uterine and fibroid sizes before treatment, which were all significantly decreased after treatment (P<0.05) when the treatment group had significantly smaller uteri and fibroids than the control group did (P<0.05). The serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol levels, arterial resistive indices and endometrial thicknesses of the two groups were similar before treatment, which were significantly increased after treatment (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the values of the two groups became significantly different (P<0.05). The treatment group was also significantly less prone to complications such as fever, vaginal bleeding and hematuria than the control group after treatment (P<0.05).
Interventional therapy, especially that guided by MRI, can be performed accurately and safely by mildly affecting the ovary and by promoting the recovery of uterine artery blood flow and endometrial thickness.
比较磁共振成像(MRI)引导与计算机断层扫描(CT)引导的介入治疗对子宫肌瘤的效果。
选取2008年8月至2014年2月在我院接受治疗的280例子宫肌瘤患者,通过随机抽签分为治疗组和对照组(n = 140)。对照组和治疗组分别接受CT引导和MRI引导的子宫动脉栓塞介入治疗。
治疗三个月后,治疗组月经过多和盆腔压迫症状的缓解率分别为94.3%和92.9%,与对照组(分别为92.9%和92.1%)相似(P>0.05)。两组治疗前子宫和肌瘤大小相似,治疗后均显著减小(P<0.05),且治疗组子宫和肌瘤明显小于对照组(P<0.05)。两组治疗前血清促卵泡生成素、促黄体生成素、雌二醇水平、动脉阻力指数和子宫内膜厚度相似,治疗后均显著升高(P<0.05)。同时,两组数值差异显著(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后发热、阴道出血和血尿等并发症也明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。
介入治疗,尤其是MRI引导下的介入治疗,能够准确、安全地进行,对卵巢影响较小,可促进子宫动脉血流和子宫内膜厚度的恢复。