Laboratory for the Psychology of Child Development and Education, CNRS Unit 8240, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité and University of Caen Basse-Normandie, France.
Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France.
Dev Sci. 2018 Jan;21(1). doi: 10.1111/desc.12491. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
Inhibitory control (i.e., the ability to resist automatisms, temptations, distractions, or interference and to adapt to conflicting situations) is a determinant of cognitive and socio-emotional development. In light of the discrepancies of previous findings on the development of inhibitory control in affectively charged contexts, two important issues need to be addressed. We need to determine (a) whether cool inhibitory control (in affectively neutral contexts) and hot inhibitory control (in affectively charged contexts) follow the same developmental pattern and (b) the degree of specificity of these two types of inhibitory control at different ages. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the developmental patterns of cool and hot inhibitory control and the degree of specificity of these abilities in children, adolescents and adults. Typically developing children, adolescents, and adults performed two Stroop-like tasks: an affectively neutral one (Cool Stroop task) and an affectively charged one (Hot Stroop task). In the Cool Stroop task, the participants were asked to identify the ink color of the words independent of color that the words named; in the Hot Stroop task, the participants were asked to identify the emotional expression of a face independent of the emotion named by a simultaneously displayed written word. We found that cool inhibitory control abilities develop linearly with age, whereas hot inhibitory control abilities follow a quadratic developmental pattern, with adolescents displaying worse hot inhibitory control abilities than children and adults. In addition, cool and hot inhibitory control abilities were correlated in children but not in adolescents and adults. The present study suggests (a) that cool and hot inhibitory control abilities develop differently from childhood to adulthood - i.e., that cool inhibition follows a linear developmental pattern and hot inhibition follows an adolescent-specific pattern - and (b) that they become progressively more domain-specific with age.
抑制控制(即抵抗自动化、诱惑、分心或干扰以及适应冲突情境的能力)是认知和社会情感发展的决定因素。鉴于先前关于情感负荷情境下抑制控制发展的研究结果存在差异,有两个重要问题需要解决。我们需要确定:(a) 冷静抑制控制(在情感中性情境中)和热抑制控制(在情感负荷情境中)是否遵循相同的发展模式;(b) 这两种类型的抑制控制在不同年龄阶段的特异性程度。因此,在本研究中,我们调查了冷静和热抑制控制的发展模式,以及这些能力在儿童、青少年和成人中的特异性程度。典型发展的儿童、青少年和成人完成了两个类似于 Stroop 的任务:一个是情感中性的(冷静 Stroop 任务),一个是情感负荷的(热 Stroop 任务)。在冷静 Stroop 任务中,参与者被要求独立于单词所命名的颜色来识别单词的墨迹颜色;在热 Stroop 任务中,参与者被要求独立于同时显示的书面单词所命名的情绪来识别面部的情绪表达。我们发现,冷静抑制控制能力随年龄呈线性发展,而热抑制控制能力呈二次发展模式,青少年的热抑制控制能力比儿童和成人差。此外,在儿童中,冷静和热抑制控制能力是相关的,但在青少年和成人中则不是。本研究表明:(a) 从儿童期到成年期,冷静和热抑制控制能力的发展方式不同——即冷静抑制遵循线性发展模式,而热抑制遵循青少年特有的模式;(b) 它们随着年龄的增长变得越来越具有领域特异性。