Majuri Joonas, Joutsa Juho, Johansson Jarkko, Voon Valerie, Alakurtti Kati, Parkkola Riitta, Lahti Tuuli, Alho Hannu, Hirvonen Jussi, Arponen Eveliina, Forsback Sarita, Kaasinen Valtteri
Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Department of Neurology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Apr;42(5):1169-1177. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.265. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
Although behavioral addictions share many clinical features with drug addictions, they show strikingly large variation in their behavioral phenotypes (such as in uncontrollable gambling or eating). Neurotransmitter function in behavioral addictions is poorly understood, but has important implications in understanding its relationship with substance use disorders and underlying mechanisms of therapeutic efficacy. Here, we compare opioid and dopamine function between two behavioral addiction phenotypes: pathological gambling (PG) and binge eating disorder (BED). Thirty-nine participants (15 PG, 7 BED, and 17 controls) were scanned with [C]carfentanil and [F]fluorodopa positron emission tomography using a high-resolution scanner. Binding potentials relative to non-displaceable binding (BP) for [C]carfentanil and influx rate constant (K) values for [F]fluorodopa were analyzed with region-of-interest and whole-brain voxel-by-voxel analyses. BED subjects showed widespread reductions in [C]carfentanil BP in multiple subcortical and cortical brain regions and in striatal [F]fluorodopa K compared with controls. In PG patients, [C]carfentanil BP was reduced in the anterior cingulate with no differences in [F]fluorodopa K compared with controls. In the nucleus accumbens, a key region involved in reward processing, [C]Carfentanil BP was 30-34% lower and [F]fluorodopa K was 20% lower in BED compared with PG and controls (p<0.002). BED and PG are thus dissociable as a function of dopaminergic and opioidergic neurotransmission. Compared with PG, BED patients show widespread losses of mu-opioid receptor availability together with presynaptic dopaminergic defects. These findings highlight the heterogeneity underlying the subtypes of addiction and indicate differential mechanisms in the expression of pathological behaviors and responses to treatment.
尽管行为成瘾与药物成瘾有许多共同的临床特征,但它们在行为表型上表现出显著的巨大差异(例如无法控制的赌博或饮食)。行为成瘾中的神经递质功能尚不清楚,但对于理解其与物质使用障碍的关系以及治疗效果的潜在机制具有重要意义。在此,我们比较了两种行为成瘾表型:病态赌博(PG)和暴饮暴食症(BED)之间的阿片类和多巴胺功能。使用高分辨率扫描仪,对39名参与者(15名PG、7名BED和17名对照)进行了[C]卡芬太尼和[F]氟多巴正电子发射断层扫描。通过感兴趣区域分析和全脑逐体素分析,分析了相对于不可置换结合的[C]卡芬太尼结合电位(BP)和[F]氟多巴的流入速率常数(K)值。与对照组相比,BED受试者在多个皮质下和皮质脑区的[C]卡芬太尼BP以及纹状体[F]氟多巴K均普遍降低。在PG患者中,与对照组相比,前扣带回的[C]卡芬太尼BP降低,而[F]氟多巴K无差异。在伏隔核(奖励处理的关键区域),与PG和对照组相比,BED的[C]卡芬太尼BP低30 - 34%,[F]氟多巴K低20%(p<0.002)。因此,BED和PG在多巴胺能和阿片样物质能神经传递方面是可分离的。与PG相比,BED患者显示出μ-阿片受体可用性的广泛丧失以及突触前多巴胺能缺陷。这些发现突出了成瘾亚型背后的异质性,并表明了病理行为表达和治疗反应的不同机制。