Suppr超能文献

诊断职业性哮喘。

Diagnosing occupational asthma.

作者信息

Vandenplas O, Suojalehto H, Cullinan P

机构信息

Department of Chest Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.

Occupational Medicine, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Jan;47(1):6-18. doi: 10.1111/cea.12858.

Abstract

Making an accurate diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA) is, generally, important. The condition has not only significant health consequences for affected workers, but also substantial socio-economic impacts for workers, their employers and wider society. Missing a diagnosis of OA may lead to continued exposure to a causative agent and progressive worsening of disease; conversely, diagnosing OA when it is not present may lead to inappropriate removal from exposure and unnecessary financial and social consequences. While the most accurate investigation is specific inhalation challenge in an experienced centre, this is a scarce resource, and in many cases, reliance is on other tests. This review provides a technical dossier of the diagnostic value of the available methods which include an appropriate clinical history, the use of specific immunology and measurement of inflammatory markers, and various methods of relating functional changes in airway calibre to periods at work. It is recommended that these approaches are used iteratively and in judicious combination, in cognizance of the individual patient's circumstances and requirements. Based on available evidence, a working diagnostic algorithm is proposed that can be adapted to the suspected agent, purpose of diagnosis and available resources. For better or worse, many of the techniques - and their interpretation - are available only in specialized centres and where there is room for doubt, referral to such a centre is probably wise. Accordingly, the implementation or development of such specialized centres with appropriate equipment and expertise should greatly improve the diagnostic evaluation of work-related asthma.

摘要

准确诊断职业性哮喘(OA)通常很重要。这种疾病不仅会给患病工人带来重大的健康后果,还会对工人、其雇主以及更广泛的社会产生重大的社会经济影响。漏诊OA可能导致持续接触致病因素,使病情逐渐恶化;相反,在不存在OA时进行诊断可能会导致不适当的脱离接触以及不必要的经济和社会后果。虽然最准确的检查是在经验丰富的中心进行特异性吸入激发试验,但这是一种稀缺资源,在许多情况下,诊断依赖于其他检查。本综述提供了现有诊断方法的技术档案,这些方法包括适当的临床病史、特异性免疫学的应用、炎症标志物的检测,以及将气道口径的功能变化与工作时段相关联的各种方法。建议根据个体患者的情况和需求,反复且明智地结合使用这些方法。基于现有证据,提出了一种可行的诊断算法,该算法可根据疑似致病因素、诊断目的和可用资源进行调整。无论好坏,许多技术及其解读仅在专业中心可用,在存在疑问的情况下,转诊至这样的中心可能是明智的。因此,配备适当设备和专业知识的此类专业中心的建立或发展应能大大改善对职业性哮喘的诊断评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验