Suppr超能文献

职业性哮喘的吸入激发试验:为何需要多次测试?

Inhalation Challenge Tests in Occupational Asthma: Why Are Multiple Tests Needed?

作者信息

Akgündüz Üzmezoğlu Bilge

机构信息

Department of Occupational Diseases, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk Thorac J. 2021 Mar;22(2):154-162. doi: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20007. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Abstract

Occupational and environmental lung diseases are on the rise because of the widespread use of various toxic agents in industry. Asthma etiopathogenesis is unclear because of exposure to high and low molecular agents in workplaces. Approximately 15-25% of asthma in adults is reported to be related to occupational exposure. The prevalence of occupational asthma (OA) is predicted to be high. The difficulties in diagnosing OA results in inadequate treatment, permanent airway damage, and medicolegal and social problems. As with other occupational diseases, it is necessary to demonstrate a direct causal relationship between the suspected agent and OA. Spirometry, peak expiratory flow rate, and/or non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness are frequently used to show airway hyperresponsiveness at the workplace and away from work. However, there are some controversies about the specificity and sensitivity of these test methods. Furthermore, these tests do not identify the exposure agent, which could be the causative agent. Specific inhalation challenge (SIC) tests that demonstrate the direct causal relationship are currently the gold standard. However, their positive and negative predictive values have not yet been established; therefore, many low molecular weight agents could cause late or atypical reactions. Therefore, a negative SIC test cannot exclude the disease. This review describes the procedures for the SIC test and discusses the importance of using the combined test methods with the SIC test.

摘要

由于工业中各种有毒物质的广泛使用,职业性和环境性肺部疾病正在增加。由于在工作场所接触高分子和低分子物质,哮喘的发病机制尚不清楚。据报道,成人哮喘中约15%-25%与职业暴露有关。预计职业性哮喘(OA)的患病率很高。OA诊断困难导致治疗不足、永久性气道损伤以及法医学和社会问题。与其他职业病一样,有必要证明疑似致病因素与OA之间存在直接因果关系。肺活量测定、呼气峰值流速和/或非特异性支气管高反应性常用于显示工作场所和非工作状态下的气道高反应性。然而,这些检测方法的特异性和敏感性存在一些争议。此外,这些检测无法识别可能是致病因素的暴露物质。能证明直接因果关系的特异性吸入激发(SIC)试验目前是金标准。然而,其阳性和阴性预测值尚未确定;因此,许多低分子量物质可能会引起迟发性或非典型反应。因此,SIC试验阴性不能排除该病。本综述描述了SIC试验的程序,并讨论了将联合检测方法与SIC试验结合使用的重要性。

相似文献

1
Inhalation Challenge Tests in Occupational Asthma: Why Are Multiple Tests Needed?
Turk Thorac J. 2021 Mar;22(2):154-162. doi: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20007. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Non-invasive tools beyond lung function before and after specific inhalation challenges for diagnosing occupational asthma.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Oct;92(7):1067-1076. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01439-y. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
Do laboratory challenge tests for occupational asthma represent what happens in the workplace?
Eur Respir J. 2018 Jun 28;51(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00059-2018. Print 2018 Jun.
4
Specific inhalation challenge: the relationship between response, clinical variables and lung function.
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Aug;74(8):586-591. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103806. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
6
Inhalation challenges with agents causing occupational asthma.
Eur Respir J. 1997 Nov;10(11):2612-29. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10112612.
8
Pulmonary Function Testing in Work-Related Asthma: An Overview from Spirometry to Specific Inhalation Challenge.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052325.
9
A systematic review of the diagnosis of occupational asthma.
Chest. 2007 Feb;131(2):569-78. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-0492.
10
Clinical evaluation of occupational asthma.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1997 Oct;52(5):469-73.

本文引用的文献

1
Occupational asthma: clinical phenotypes, biomarkers, and management.
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000535.
2
[The usefulness of bronchial challenge tests in the diagnosis of occupational asthma].
Med Pr. 2018 Aug 20;69(4):457-471. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00717. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
3
Allergic sinusitis and severe asthma caused by occupational exposure to locust bean gum: Case report.
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Jul;60(7):658-663. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22725. Epub 2017 May 12.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Inflammatory Markers for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1371-1377.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
5
Review of Diagnostic Challenges in Occupational Asthma.
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Jan;17(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0676-3.
6
Occupational lung diseases: from old and novel exposures to effective preventive strategies.
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 May;5(5):445-455. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30424-6. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
7
Diagnosing occupational asthma.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Jan;47(1):6-18. doi: 10.1111/cea.12858.
10
Predictive value of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in occupational asthma.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Feb;137(2):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验