• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inhalation Challenge Tests in Occupational Asthma: Why Are Multiple Tests Needed?职业性哮喘的吸入激发试验:为何需要多次测试?
Turk Thorac J. 2021 Mar;22(2):154-162. doi: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20007. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Non-invasive tools beyond lung function before and after specific inhalation challenges for diagnosing occupational asthma.特定吸入挑战前后的肺功能以外的非侵入性工具在职业性哮喘诊断中的应用。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Oct;92(7):1067-1076. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01439-y. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
Do laboratory challenge tests for occupational asthma represent what happens in the workplace?职业性哮喘的实验室挑战试验是否能反映工作场所的情况?
Eur Respir J. 2018 Jun 28;51(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00059-2018. Print 2018 Jun.
4
Specific inhalation challenge: the relationship between response, clinical variables and lung function.特异性吸入激发试验:反应、临床变量与肺功能之间的关系
Occup Environ Med. 2017 Aug;74(8):586-591. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103806. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
5
[Specific challenge tests in occupational asthma--guidelines by the Finnish Expert Group on Occupational Lung Diseases].[职业性哮喘的特定激发试验——芬兰职业性肺病专家组指南]
Duodecim. 2011;127(20):2205-14.
6
Inhalation challenges with agents causing occupational asthma.使用导致职业性哮喘的药物进行吸入激发试验。
Eur Respir J. 1997 Nov;10(11):2612-29. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10112612.
7
Increase in non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness as an early marker of bronchial response to occupational agents during specific inhalation challenges.在特异性吸入激发试验期间,非特异性支气管高反应性增加作为支气管对职业性因素反应的早期标志物。
Thorax. 1996 May;51(5):472-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.51.5.472.
8
Pulmonary Function Testing in Work-Related Asthma: An Overview from Spirometry to Specific Inhalation Challenge.工作相关哮喘的肺功能检测:从肺量计到特异性吸入挑战的概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;18(5):2325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052325.
9
A systematic review of the diagnosis of occupational asthma.职业性哮喘诊断的系统评价
Chest. 2007 Feb;131(2):569-78. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-0492.
10
Clinical evaluation of occupational asthma.职业性哮喘的临床评估
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1997 Oct;52(5):469-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemical respiratory sensitization-Current status of mechanistic understanding, knowledge gaps and possible identification methods of sensitizers.化学性呼吸道致敏作用——作用机制的理解现状、知识空白及致敏剂的可能识别方法
Front Toxicol. 2024 Jul 29;6:1331803. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1331803. eCollection 2024.
2
New approach methodologies to enhance human health risk assessment of immunotoxic properties of chemicals - a PARC (Partnership for the Assessment of Risk from Chemicals) project.增强化学品免疫毒性特性人体健康风险评估的新方法学——化学品风险评估合作组织(PARC)项目
Front Toxicol. 2024 Apr 9;6:1339104. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2024.1339104. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Occupational asthma: clinical phenotypes, biomarkers, and management.职业性哮喘:临床表型、生物标志物和管理。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):59-63. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000535.
2
[The usefulness of bronchial challenge tests in the diagnosis of occupational asthma].[支气管激发试验在职业性哮喘诊断中的应用价值]
Med Pr. 2018 Aug 20;69(4):457-471. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00717. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
3
Allergic sinusitis and severe asthma caused by occupational exposure to locust bean gum: Case report.职业性接触刺槐豆胶引起的变应性鼻窦炎和重度哮喘:病例报告。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Jul;60(7):658-663. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22725. Epub 2017 May 12.
4
Diagnostic Accuracy of Inflammatory Markers for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma.炎症标志物诊断职业性哮喘的准确性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1371-1377.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
5
Review of Diagnostic Challenges in Occupational Asthma.职业性哮喘诊断挑战述评。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017 Jan;17(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11882-017-0676-3.
6
Occupational lung diseases: from old and novel exposures to effective preventive strategies.职业性肺部疾病:从传统和新型暴露因素到有效预防策略。
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 May;5(5):445-455. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30424-6. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
7
Diagnosing occupational asthma.诊断职业性哮喘。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Jan;47(1):6-18. doi: 10.1111/cea.12858.
8
Occupational Asthma: Contribution of Smoking and Hereditary Effects.职业性哮喘:吸烟及遗传因素的作用
Iran J Public Health. 2016 Jul;45(7):956-7.
9
The role and interpretation of specific inhalation challenges in the diagnosis of occupational asthma.特异性吸入激发试验在职业性哮喘诊断中的作用及解读
Can Respir J. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(6):322-3. doi: 10.1155/2015/591010.
10
Predictive value of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in occupational asthma.非特异性支气管反应性在职业性哮喘中的预测价值。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Feb;137(2):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

职业性哮喘的吸入激发试验:为何需要多次测试?

Inhalation Challenge Tests in Occupational Asthma: Why Are Multiple Tests Needed?

作者信息

Akgündüz Üzmezoğlu Bilge

机构信息

Department of Occupational Diseases, Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk Thorac J. 2021 Mar;22(2):154-162. doi: 10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20007. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

DOI:10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20007
PMID:33871340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8051293/
Abstract

Occupational and environmental lung diseases are on the rise because of the widespread use of various toxic agents in industry. Asthma etiopathogenesis is unclear because of exposure to high and low molecular agents in workplaces. Approximately 15-25% of asthma in adults is reported to be related to occupational exposure. The prevalence of occupational asthma (OA) is predicted to be high. The difficulties in diagnosing OA results in inadequate treatment, permanent airway damage, and medicolegal and social problems. As with other occupational diseases, it is necessary to demonstrate a direct causal relationship between the suspected agent and OA. Spirometry, peak expiratory flow rate, and/or non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness are frequently used to show airway hyperresponsiveness at the workplace and away from work. However, there are some controversies about the specificity and sensitivity of these test methods. Furthermore, these tests do not identify the exposure agent, which could be the causative agent. Specific inhalation challenge (SIC) tests that demonstrate the direct causal relationship are currently the gold standard. However, their positive and negative predictive values have not yet been established; therefore, many low molecular weight agents could cause late or atypical reactions. Therefore, a negative SIC test cannot exclude the disease. This review describes the procedures for the SIC test and discusses the importance of using the combined test methods with the SIC test.

摘要

由于工业中各种有毒物质的广泛使用,职业性和环境性肺部疾病正在增加。由于在工作场所接触高分子和低分子物质,哮喘的发病机制尚不清楚。据报道,成人哮喘中约15%-25%与职业暴露有关。预计职业性哮喘(OA)的患病率很高。OA诊断困难导致治疗不足、永久性气道损伤以及法医学和社会问题。与其他职业病一样,有必要证明疑似致病因素与OA之间存在直接因果关系。肺活量测定、呼气峰值流速和/或非特异性支气管高反应性常用于显示工作场所和非工作状态下的气道高反应性。然而,这些检测方法的特异性和敏感性存在一些争议。此外,这些检测无法识别可能是致病因素的暴露物质。能证明直接因果关系的特异性吸入激发(SIC)试验目前是金标准。然而,其阳性和阴性预测值尚未确定;因此,许多低分子量物质可能会引起迟发性或非典型反应。因此,SIC试验阴性不能排除该病。本综述描述了SIC试验的程序,并讨论了将联合检测方法与SIC试验结合使用的重要性。