早期宫颈癌的非根治性手术:锥切标本能否帮助识别低盆腔淋巴结转移风险患者?

Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: Can conization specimens help identify patients at low risk for parametrial involvement?

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):290-293. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.029. Epub 2016 Nov 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer is associated with increased morbidity over an extrafascial hysterectomy. The goal of this study was to determine incidence of and risk factors for parametrial involvement (PI) based on conization specimen (CS) and to potentially identify candidates for less radical surgery.

METHODS

Patients with FIGO IA2-IIA cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (RH) from 2000 to 2010 were retrospectively identified. Data was extracted from operative and pathology reports. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test, t-test, and asymptotic logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 267 RH patients identified, 118 (44%) had conization prior to RH. The incidence of PI was 15.7% overall and 7.5% in patients treated with conization prior to RH. There was no association between PI and histology, stage, grade, or tumor size. Conization patients with PI were more likely to have LVSI on CS (77.8% vs. 29.4%) and positive lymph nodes (LNP) (66.7% vs. 8.3%). Of patients with positive endocervical curettage, a modest 12% had PI, which was not statistically significant. Tumor size, depth of invasion, and margin status on CS were not statistically associated with PI. In logistic regression analysis, LNP alone or LNP+LVSI were predictive of PI.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PI in early-stage cervical cancer is significant. Only LVSI on CS and LNP were predictors of PI in the current study. While there may be select patients with early stage cervical cancer who can be spared parametrectomy, additional research is warranted.

摘要

目的

宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术比筋膜外子宫切除术有更高的发病率。本研究的目的是根据锥切标本(CS)确定宫旁侵犯(PI)的发生率和危险因素,并可能确定更保守手术的候选者。

方法

回顾性分析 2000 年至 2010 年接受根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术(RH)治疗的FIGO IA2-IIA 期宫颈癌患者。从手术和病理报告中提取数据。使用 Fisher 精确检验、t 检验和渐近逻辑回归进行统计分析。

结果

在 267 例 RH 患者中,118 例(44%)在 RH 前有锥切术。PI 的总发生率为 15.7%,在 RH 前接受锥切术的患者中为 7.5%。PI 与组织学、分期、分级或肿瘤大小无关。PI 的 CS 锥切患者更可能有 LVSI(77.8% vs. 29.4%)和阳性淋巴结(LNP)(66.7% vs. 8.3%)。在接受宫颈管搔刮术的患者中,PI 发生率略高,为 12%,但无统计学意义。CS 上的肿瘤大小、浸润深度和边缘状态与 PI 无统计学关联。在逻辑回归分析中,单独的 LNP 或 LNP+LVSI 是 PI 的预测因子。

结论

早期宫颈癌的 PI 发生率较高。在本研究中,只有 CS 上的 LVSI 和 LNP 是 PI 的预测因子。虽然可能有少数早期宫颈癌患者可以免于行宫旁切除术,但需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索