Suppr超能文献

宫颈癌锥切术后残留疾病的预测因素。

Predictive Factors for Residual Disease After Conization in Cervical Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Anatomic Pathology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6673-6681. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09656-x. Epub 2021 Feb 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate predictive factors for the presence of residual disease after conization followed by definitive surgery in cervical cancer, and suggest a margin distance threshold that could predict residual disease.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a series of 42 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent primary conization before definitive surgical treatment from March 2009 to May 2020. All conization specimens were reviewed for endocervical, ectocervical, and radial margins. Cases with residual disease in magnetic resonance imaging before definitive surgery were excluded.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (78.6%) patients underwent hysterectomies and 9 (21.4%) trachelectomies ± lymph node staging. Twelve (28.6%) cases were stage IA1, 5 (11.8%) cases were stage IA2, 13 (31%) cases were stage IB1, 11 (26.2%) cases were stage IB2, and 1 (2.4%) case was stage IIIC1 [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2019]. We found residual disease in 17 (40.4%) surgical specimens. Of the 20 patients with negative margins, there were still 3 (15%) cases with residual disease. Conversely, residual disease was identified in 14 (63.6%) of the 22 patients with positive cone margins (p = 0.001). Tumor size [odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.33] and positive endocervical margin status (OR 33.6, 95% CI 3.85-293.3) were related to a higher risk of residual disease in multivariate analysis. Notably, all patients with tumors larger than 2 cm had residual disease, in contrast to 29.4% in lesions up to 2 cm (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

We found that tumor size and positive margin were predictive factors for residual disease. We could not suggest a reliable minimum margin distance threshold that could predict residual disease.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估宫颈锥切术后行确定性手术时存在残留疾病的预测因素,并提出一个可能预测残留疾病的切缘距离阈值。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2009 年 3 月至 2020 年 5 月期间,42 例因早期宫颈癌行初次宫颈锥切术,随后行确定性手术治疗的患者系列。所有宫颈锥切标本均进行了宫颈内口、宫颈外口和放射状切缘的评估。排除在确定性手术前磁共振成像中有残留疾病的病例。

结果

33 例(78.6%)患者行子宫切除术,9 例(21.4%)行宫颈切除术+淋巴结分期。12 例(28.6%)为 IA1 期,5 例(11.8%)为 IA2 期,13 例(31%)为 IB1 期,11 例(26.2%)为 IB2 期,1 例(2.4%)为 IIIC1 期[国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)2019 年]。我们发现 17 例(40.4%)手术标本有残留疾病。在 20 例切缘阴性的患者中,仍有 3 例(15%)有残留疾病。相反,在 22 例切缘阳性的宫颈锥切标本中,有 14 例(63.6%)发现有残留疾病(p=0.001)。多变量分析显示,肿瘤大小[比值比(OR)1.71,95%置信区间(CI)1.02-1.33]和阳性宫颈内口切缘状态(OR 33.6,95% CI 3.85-293.3)与残留疾病风险增加相关。值得注意的是,所有肿瘤大于 2 cm 的患者均有残留疾病,而肿瘤最大径小于等于 2 cm 的患者中,有残留疾病的比例为 29.4%(p=0.002)。

结论

我们发现肿瘤大小和阳性切缘是残留疾病的预测因素。我们不能提出一个可靠的最小切缘距离阈值来预测残留疾病。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验