• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈癌切缘阳性行宫颈锥切术的临床效果。

Clinical effects of cervical conization with positive margins in cervical cancer.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsuruma-cho 65, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.

Institute for Advanced Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 2;11(1):23288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02635-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-02635-y
PMID:34857803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8639761/
Abstract

Radical surgery after cervical conization is a common approach for the treatment of cervical cancer. In some cases, disease progression is observed after positive margins at conization, but the effect of conization on disease progression remains unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of positive margins at conization in cervical cancer. A total of 101 patients who underwent cervical conization before radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were considered eligible by reviewing medical records. The association between the positive margins and patient outcomes, including subsequent lymph node metastasis, was evaluated. The rate of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) positivity at radical surgery was significantly higher in patients with positive margins (p = 0.017) than in those with negative margins, although there was no significant difference in the rate of pelvic lymph node metastasis (p = 0.155). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the overall survival or progression-free survival between the two groups (p = 0.332 and 0.200, respectively). A positive margin at conization presented no significant prognostic disadvantage; thus, diagnostic conization is one of the most suitable treatment options for early-stage cervical cancer that is difficult to accurately assess.

摘要

宫颈锥切术后行根治性手术是治疗宫颈癌的常用方法。在某些情况下,锥切术后切缘阳性会观察到疾病进展,但锥切术对疾病进展的影响仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在探讨宫颈癌锥切术后切缘阳性的临床结果。通过回顾病历,共纳入 101 例在根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术前行宫颈锥切术的患者。评估了切缘阳性与包括淋巴结转移在内的患者结局之间的相关性。在接受根治性手术的患者中,阳性切缘患者的脉管侵犯(LVSI)阳性率显著高于阴性切缘患者(p=0.017),尽管盆腔淋巴结转移率无显著差异(p=0.155)。此外,两组患者的总生存或无进展生存无显著差异(p=0.332 和 0.200)。宫颈锥切术后切缘阳性并不预示预后不良;因此,对于难以准确评估的早期宫颈癌,诊断性锥切术是最适合的治疗选择之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/8639761/cb874cd85235/41598_2021_2635_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/8639761/35c72425ae5c/41598_2021_2635_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/8639761/75cc92349ad8/41598_2021_2635_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/8639761/cb874cd85235/41598_2021_2635_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/8639761/35c72425ae5c/41598_2021_2635_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/8639761/75cc92349ad8/41598_2021_2635_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89c1/8639761/cb874cd85235/41598_2021_2635_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical effects of cervical conization with positive margins in cervical cancer.宫颈癌切缘阳性行宫颈锥切术的临床效果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 2;11(1):23288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02635-y.
2
Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).冷刀锥切术作为微小浸润性宫颈鳞状细胞癌(IA1期)患者保守治疗的临床价值
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014 Sep;24(7):1306-11. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000199.
3
Conservative surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: what percentage of patients may be eligible for conization and lymphadenectomy?早期宫颈癌的保守性手术:有多少比例的患者可能适合行锥切术和淋巴结切除术?
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Nov;119(2):183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
4
Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review.宫颈低危型癌症的锥切术和淋巴结评估。是否到了避免根治性手术的时候?回顾性系列研究和文献复习。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Nov;266:163-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
5
Conization and lymph node evaluation as a fertility-sparing treatment for early stage cervical cancer.锥形切除术和淋巴结评估作为早期宫颈癌的保留生育力治疗。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Mar;31(3):457-461. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001740.
6
[Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].[I a2-II a2期宫颈癌腹腔镜与开腹根治性子宫切除术后的长期肿瘤学结局:一项配对队列研究]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):894-901.
7
Postoperative outcomes of MR-invisible stage IB1 cervical cancer.磁共振成像不可见的ⅠB1期宫颈癌的术后结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;211(2):168.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.02.032. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
8
Predictive Factors of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.早期宫颈癌盆腔淋巴结转移的预测因素。
Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41(4):194-198. doi: 10.1159/000485840. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
9
Treatment and outcome of stage Ia1 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.IA1 期宫颈鳞癌的治疗与结局。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Apr;113(1):72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.027.
10
Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.微小浸润性宫颈癌的外科治疗:对根治性有影响的病理特征分析
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 May;25(4):694-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000416.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a nomogram for predicting positive margins after cold knife conization in patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.用于预测高级别鳞状上皮内病变患者冷刀锥切术后切缘阳性的列线图的开发。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 6;104(23):e42759. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042759.
2
Prognostic Value of Body Composition and Systemic Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Following Chemoradiotherapy.局部晚期宫颈癌患者放化疗后身体组成和全身炎症标志物的预后价值
J Inflamm Res. 2023 Nov 10;16:5145-5156. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S435366. eCollection 2023.
3
Extensive lesions and a positive cone margin are strong predictors of residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for squamous intraepithelial lesion grade 2 or 3 study design.

本文引用的文献

1
Protective Role of Conization Before Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Score Matching Study.锥切术在前瞻性宫颈癌根治术前的保护作用:倾向评分匹配研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul;28(7):3585-3594. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09695-4. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
2
Predictive Factors for Residual Disease After Conization in Cervical Cancer.宫颈癌锥切术后残留疾病的预测因素。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6673-6681. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09656-x. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Surgical Approach and Use of Uterine Manipulator Are Not Associated with LVSI in Surgery for Early-stage Cervical Cancer.
广泛病变和阳性锥切缘是宫颈上皮内瘤变 2 级或 3 级行锥切术后行子宫切除术时存在残留病灶的强烈预测因子。研究设计。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Aug 28;23(1):454. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02568-w.
4
The Influence of Family-Oriented Enabling Psychological Nursing on Posttraumatic Stress and Fear of Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Cancer.家庭导向赋能心理护理对宫颈癌患者创伤后应激及复发恐惧的影响
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jun 24;2022:6720287. doi: 10.1155/2022/6720287. eCollection 2022.
手术入路和子宫操纵器的使用与早期宫颈癌手术中的 LVSI 无关。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Sep;28(9):1573-1578. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
4
Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.腹腔镜下无子宫操作器械的神经保护广泛性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌 IB 期:技术描述、LACC 试验时代后的经验和结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;303(4):1039-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05835-5. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
5
Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?早期宫颈癌微创手术后的生存情况:宫内操作器是否有责任?
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Dec;30(12):1864-1870. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001816. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
The basic principles of oncologic surgery during minimally invasive radical hysterectomy.微创根治性子宫切除术中肿瘤外科手术的基本原则。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):e33. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e33.
7
Value and limitation of conization as a diagnostic procedure for cervical neoplasm.宫颈锥切术作为宫颈肿瘤诊断方法的价值与局限性。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Dec;45(12):2419-2424. doi: 10.1111/jog.14118. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
8
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术联合经阴道阴道残端关闭术——一项多中心分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):845-850. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388.
9
Increasing risk of uterine cervical cancer among young Japanese women: Comparison of incidence trends in Japan, South Korea and Japanese-Americans between 1985 and 2012.日本、韩国和日本裔美国人 1985 年至 2012 年期间宫颈癌发病率趋势比较:年轻日本女性的患病风险上升。
Int J Cancer. 2019 May 1;144(9):2144-2152. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32014. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
10
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.