Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK; Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK.
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Resuscitation. 2016 Dec;109:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
This study explores why resuscitation is withheld when emergency medical staff arrive at the scene of a cardiac arrest and identifies modifiable factors associated with this decision.
This is a secondary analysis of unselected patients who sustained an out of hospital cardiac arrest attended by ambulance vehicles participating in a randomized controlled trial of a mechanical chest compression device (PARAMEDIC trial). Patients were categorized as 'non-resuscitation' patients if there was a do-not-attempt-cardiopulmonary-resuscitation (DNACPR) order, signs unequivocally associated with death or resuscitation was deemed futile (15min had elapsed since collapse with no bystander-CPR and asystole recorded on EMS arrival).
Emergency Medical Services attended 11,451 cardiac arrests. Resuscitation was attempted or continued by Emergency Medical Service staff in 4805 (42%) of cases. Resuscitation was withheld in 6646 cases (58%). 711 (6.2%) had a do not attempt resuscitation decision, 4439 (38.8%) had signs unequivocally associated with death and in 1496 cases (13.1%) CPR was considered futile. Those where resuscitation was withheld due to futility were characterised by low bystander CPR rates (7.2%) and by being female.
Resuscitation was withheld by ambulance staff in over one in ten (13.1%) victims of out of hospital cardiac arrest on the basis of futility. These cases were associated with a very low rate of bystander CPR. Future studies should explore strengthening the 'Chain of Survival' to increase the community bystander CPR response and evaluate the effect on the numbers of survivors from out of hospital cardiac arrest.
本研究旨在探讨急救人员到达心搏骤停现场时为何会停止复苏,并确定与该决策相关的可改变因素。
这是一项对参加机械胸部按压设备随机对照试验(PARAMEDIC 试验)的救护车接送的院外心搏骤停未选择患者的二次分析。如果有不进行心肺复苏(DNACPR)的医嘱、有明确与死亡相关的迹象或复苏被认为无效(从发病到无旁观者心肺复苏和 EMS 到达时记录的心搏停止已经过去 15 分钟),则将患者归类为“不复苏”患者。
紧急医疗服务机构共收治了 11451 例心搏骤停患者。在 4805 例(42%)患者中,急救人员尝试或继续进行了复苏。在 6646 例(58%)患者中,未进行复苏。有 711 例(6.2%)有不尝试复苏的决定,4439 例(38.8%)有明确与死亡相关的迹象,在 1496 例(13.1%)患者中 CPR 被认为无效。由于无效而被放弃复苏的患者,其特点是旁观者 CPR 率较低(7.2%),且为女性。
在院外心搏骤停患者中,有超过十分之一(13.1%)的患者因无效而被救护车工作人员放弃复苏。这些患者的旁观者 CPR 率非常低。未来的研究应探讨加强“生存链”以提高社区旁观者的 CPR 反应,并评估对院外心搏骤停幸存者数量的影响。