Choi Seulki, Shin Sang Do, Park Jeong Ho, Ro Young Sun, Kim Ki Hong, Song Kyoung Jun, Hong Ki Jeong
Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, South Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, South Korea.
Resuscitation. 2025 Jan;206:110476. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2024.110476. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
A crowd crush can lead to respiratory arrest and result in multiple mass cardiac arrests (MCAs), which are often classified as Black Tag in disaster triage. Recently, many laypersons have been commonly trained in compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) without ventilation support in various communities. This study aims to describe the characteristics of bystander CPR administered and the outcomes of MCAs during the Itaewon crowd crush incident.
An observational study was conducted on the CPR characteristics of MCAs during the Halloween Festival in 2022, utilizing two databases: (1) MCAs registered in the Korea Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry (KOHCAR) and (2) MCAs uploaded on social media platforms (Instagram and YouTube), identified through relevant keyword searches. Video clips with a minimum streaming time of 10 s and a clear view of bystander CPR were analyzed. General demographic findings were analyzed using the KOHCAR, while the type of bystander CPR (compression-only CPR with or without rescue breathing) was compared using the social media data.
Of the 218 patients attended by EMS, 119 MCAs were registered in KOHCAR. The mean age of the victims was 24.5 years, with 10 (8.4%) being non-Korean. The median ambulance response time was 59 min. Among the victims, 22 (18.5%) received CPR (19 bybystanders, 2 by first responders, and 1 by a disaster medical assistant team), followed by EMS resuscitation, while 7 (5.9%) received CPR first by the EMS team. The remaining 90 victims (75.6%) were pronounced deceased by EMS providers. Three victims (2.5%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in the field, and one (0.8%) survived to hospital discharge. From the social media database, 26 video clips containing CPR were identified (14 from 251 clips on Instagram and 12 from 187 on YouTube), excluding duplicates and non-CPR cases. In the 26 video clips containing CPR, a total of 228 bystander CPR cases were identified in the video clips. Of these, 217 (95.2%) involved compression-only CPR, while 11 cases (4.8%) included CPR with rescue breathing.
Most MCAs were pronounced deceased, likely due to their classification as Black Tag or delayed response times. Only a small percentage (4.8%) of bystander CPR cases included rescue breathing. An optimized resuscitation protocol for MCAs in crowd crush scenarios should be developed.
人群挤压可导致呼吸骤停,并引发多次成批心搏骤停(MCAs),在灾难分诊中这些情况通常被归类为黑色标签。最近,许多外行人在各个社区接受了仅胸外按压的心肺复苏术(CPR)培训,而没有通气支持。本研究旨在描述在梨泰院人群挤压事件中旁观者实施心肺复苏术的特征以及成批心搏骤停的结果。
利用两个数据库对2022年万圣节期间成批心搏骤停的心肺复苏术特征进行了一项观察性研究:(1)韩国院外心脏骤停登记处(KOHCAR)登记的成批心搏骤停病例;(2)通过相关关键词搜索在社交媒体平台(Instagram和YouTube)上上传的成批心搏骤停病例。分析了播放时间至少为10秒且能清晰看到旁观者心肺复苏术的视频片段。使用KOHCAR分析一般人口统计学结果,同时使用社交媒体数据比较旁观者心肺复苏术的类型(有或没有人工呼吸的仅胸外按压心肺复苏术)。
在接受紧急医疗服务(EMS)救治的218名患者中,有119例成批心搏骤停病例在KOHCAR中登记。受害者的平均年龄为24.5岁,其中10例(8.4%)为非韩国人。救护车的中位响应时间为59分钟。在受害者中,22例(18.5%)接受了心肺复苏术(19例由旁观者实施,2例由急救人员实施,1例由灾难医疗辅助团队实施),随后接受了EMS复苏,而7例(5.9%)首先由EMS团队进行了心肺复苏术。其余90名受害者(75.6%)被EMS人员宣布死亡。3名受害者(2.5%)在现场实现了自主循环恢复(ROSC),1名(0.8%)存活至出院。从社交媒体数据库中,识别出26个包含心肺复苏术的视频片段(Instagram上251个片段中有14个,YouTube上187个片段中有12个),排除了重复和非心肺复苏术的病例。在这26个包含心肺复苏术的视频片段中,视频中总共识别出228例旁观者心肺复苏术病例。其中,217例(95.2%)为仅胸外按压心肺复苏术,11例(4.8%)包括有人工呼吸的心肺复苏术。
大多数成批心搏骤停病例被宣布死亡,可能是由于其被归类为黑色标签或响应时间延迟。旁观者心肺复苏术病例中只有一小部分(4.8%)包括人工呼吸。应制定针对人群挤压场景中成批心搏骤停的优化复苏方案。