Research and Development Unit, FinnHEMS Ltd, WTC Helsinki Airport, Lentäjäntie 3, 01530, Vantaa, Finland.
Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Perioperative, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Töölö Hospital, Topeliuksenkatu 5, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 2;27(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0663-x.
Making ethically sound treatment limitations in prehospital care is a complex topic. Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) physicians were surveyed on their experiences with limitations of care orders in the prehospital setting, including situations where they are dispatched to healthcare facilities or nursing homes.
A nationwide multicentre study was conducted among all HEMS physicians in Finland in 2017 using a questionnaire with closed five-point Likert-scale questions and open questions. The Ethics Committee of the Tampere University Hospital approved the study protocol (R15048).
Fifty-nine (88%) physicians responded. Their median age was 43 (IQR 38-47) and median medical working experience was 15 (IQR 10-20) years. All respondents made limitation of care orders and 39% made them often. Three fourths (75%) of the physicians were often dispatched to healthcare facilities and nursing homes and the majority (93%) regularly met patients who should have already had a valid limitation of care order. Every other physician (49%) had sometimes decided not to implement a medically justifiable limitation of care order because they wanted to avoid conflicts with the patient and/or the next of kin and/or other healthcare staff. Limitation of care order practices varied between the respondents, but neither age nor working experience explained these differences in answers. Most physicians (85%) stated that limitations of care orders are part of their work and 81% did not find them especially burdensome. The most challenging patient groups for treatment limitations were the under-aged patients, the severely disabled patients and the patients in healthcare facilities or residing in nursing homes.
Making limitation of care orders is an important but often invisible part of a HEMS physician's work. HEMS physicians expressed that patients in long-term care were often without limitations of care orders in situations where an order would have been ethically in accordance with the patient's best interests.
在院前医疗中做出合乎伦理的治疗限制是一个复杂的问题。本研究调查了直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)医师在院前环境中限制照护医嘱的经验,包括他们被派往医疗机构或疗养院的情况。
2017 年,在芬兰对所有 HEMS 医师进行了一项全国多中心研究,使用了带有五点 Likert 量表封闭式问题和开放式问题的问卷。坦佩雷大学医院伦理委员会批准了该研究方案(R15048)。
59 名(88%)医师做出了回复。他们的中位年龄为 43 岁(IQR 38-47),中位医疗工作经验为 15 年(IQR 10-20)。所有受访者都制定了限制照护医嘱,其中 39%的人经常制定。四分之三(75%)的医师经常被派往医疗机构和疗养院,大多数(93%)经常遇到应该已经有有效限制照护医嘱的患者。每两名医师中就有一名(49%)有时会决定不执行合理的限制照护医嘱,因为他们希望避免与患者和/或患者的近亲以及/或其他医护人员发生冲突。限制照护医嘱的实践在受访者之间存在差异,但年龄和工作经验都无法解释这些答案的差异。大多数医师(85%)表示限制照护医嘱是他们工作的一部分,81%的人认为这些医嘱并不特别繁琐。对治疗限制最具挑战性的患者群体是未成年患者、严重残疾患者以及在医疗机构或疗养院居住的患者。
制定限制照护医嘱是 HEMS 医师工作的重要但往往是无形的一部分。HEMS 医师表示,在符合患者最佳利益的情况下,长期照护中的患者往往没有限制照护医嘱。