Asai Kazuhisa, Hirata Kazuto, Hashimoto Shu, Fukuchi Yoshinosuke, Kitawaki Tetsuji, Ikeda Kimitoshi, Fogel Robert, Banerji Donald
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Respir Investig. 2016 Nov;54(6):428-435. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
To better evaluate the efficacy and safety of the indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium in Japanese patients, a pooled data analysis was conducted from the SHINE and ARISE studies, which were part of the IND/GLY clinical trial program.
Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were included in the analysis. Efficacy in terms of pre-dose forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV) at Week 12 and Week 24/26 (ARISE/SHINE) and FEV at 30min and 60min post-dose at Day 1, Week 12, and Week 24/26 was evaluated. Health status using the St. George׳s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, rescue medication use (number of puffs/day), safety, and tolerability were also assessed.
In total, 340 patients (IND/GLY, n=161; IND, n=41; GLY, n=40; tiotropium, n=79; and placebo, n=19) were included in the analysis that focused on comparing IND/GLY versus tiotropium since they were included in both studies. At Week 12 and Week 24/26, pre-dose FEV was significantly improved with IND/GLY compared with tiotropium (treatment differences=70mL and 80mL, respectively; both P≤0.001). FEV at 30min and 60min post-dose, the SGRQ total score, and rescue medication use were more statistically significant with IND/GLY than with tiotropium for all assessed time-points. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar between the IND/GLY- and tiotropium-treated groups.
Compared to tiotropium, IND/GLY provided significant improvements in lung function, health status, and rescue medication use, while having a good safety profile in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.
为了更好地评估茚达特罗/格隆溴铵(IND/GLY)固定剂量复方制剂与噻托溴铵相比在日本患者中的疗效和安全性,对SHINE和ARISE研究进行了汇总数据分析,这两项研究是IND/GLY临床试验项目的一部分。
分析纳入了日本中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者。评估了第12周和第24/26周(ARISE/SHINE)的给药前一秒用力呼气量(FEV)以及第1天、第12周和第24/26周给药后30分钟和60分钟的FEV疗效。还评估了使用圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分的健康状况、急救药物使用情况(每日吸数)、安全性和耐受性。
共有340例患者(IND/GLY组161例、茚达特罗组41例、格隆溴铵组40例、噻托溴铵组79例、安慰剂组19例)纳入了该分析,该分析重点比较IND/GLY与噻托溴铵,因为它们都纳入了这两项研究。在第12周和第24/26周,与噻托溴铵相比,IND/GLY使给药前FEV显著改善(治疗差异分别为70mL和80mL;P均≤0.001)。在所有评估时间点,IND/GLY在给药后30分钟和60分钟的FEV、SGRQ总分和急救药物使用方面比噻托溴铵具有更显著的统计学差异。IND/GLY治疗组和噻托溴铵治疗组之间不良事件(AE)和严重AE的总体发生率相似。
与噻托溴铵相比,IND/GLY在日本中重度COPD患者中可显著改善肺功能、健康状况和急救药物使用情况,同时具有良好的安全性。