• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COPD 患者中,每日一次茚达特罗和格隆溴铵联合用药与茚达特罗单药治疗的疗效和安全性:GLOW6 研究。

Efficacy and safety of coadministration of once-daily indacaterol and glycopyrronium versus indacaterol alone in COPD patients: the GLOW6 study.

机构信息

Respiratory Division, University Hospital, UZ Brussel, Free University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

Longartsenpraktijk, Prins Bisschopssingel, Hasselt, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Feb 24;9:215-28. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S51592. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S51592
PMID:24596459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3940646/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Addition of a second bronchodilator from a different pharmacological class may benefit patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) whose symptoms are insufficiently controlled by bronchodilator monotherapy. GLOW6 evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily coadministration of the long-acting β2-agonist indacaterol (IND) and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist glycopyrronium (GLY) versus IND alone in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled, 12-week study, patients were randomized 1:1 to IND 150 μg and GLY 50 μg daily (IND + GLY) or IND 150 μg daily and placebo (IND + PBO) (all delivered via separate Breezhaler® devices). The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of IND + GLY versus IND + PBO for trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 12. Other end points included trough FEV1 at day 1, FEV1 area under the curve from 30 minutes to 4 hours (AUC30min-4h), peak FEV1, inspiratory capacity and trough forced vital capacity (FVC) at day 1 and week 12, and transition dyspnea index (TDI) focal score, COPD symptoms, and rescue medication use over 12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 449 patients were randomized (IND + GLY, 226; IND + PBO, 223); 94% completed the study. On day 1 and at week 12, IND + GLY significantly improved trough FEV1 versus IND + PBO, with treatment differences of 74 mL (95% CI 46-101 mL) and 64 mL (95% CI 28-99 mL), respectively (both P<0.001). IND + GLY significantly improved postdose peak FEV1, FEV1 AUC30min-4h, and trough FVC at day 1 and week 12 versus IND + PBO (all P<0.01). TDI focal score and COPD symptoms (percentage of days able to perform usual daily activities and change from baseline in mean daytime respiratory score) were significantly improved with IND + GLY versus IND + PBO (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse events was similar for the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, once-daily coadministration of IND and GLY provides significant and sustained improvement in bronchodilation versus IND alone from day 1, with significant improvements in patient-centered outcomes.

摘要

背景

对于因支气管扩张剂单药治疗未能充分控制症状而导致病情处于中重度的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,添加一种来自不同药理学类别的第二种支气管扩张剂可能有益。GLOW6 评估了长效β2-激动剂茚达特罗(IND)和长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂格隆溴铵(GLY)联合用药与 IND 单药治疗对中重度 COPD 患者的疗效和安全性。

材料和方法

在这项随机、双盲、平行分组、安慰剂对照、为期 12 周的研究中,患者以 1:1 的比例随机分配至 IND150μg 和 GLY50μg 每日一次(IND+GLY)或 IND150μg 每日一次和安慰剂(IND+PBO)(均通过单独的 Breezhaler®装置给药)。主要终点是证明 IND+GLY 相对于 IND+PBO 在第 12 周时谷值用力呼气量(FEV1)的优越性。其他终点包括第 1 天的谷值 FEV1、30 分钟至 4 小时(AUC30min-4h)的 FEV1 曲线下面积、第 1 天和第 12 周的峰值 FEV1、吸气量和谷值用力肺活量(FVC)、转移呼吸困难指数(TDI)焦点评分、COPD 症状和 12 周内的急救药物使用情况。

结果

共有 449 名患者被随机分配(IND+GLY,226 名;IND+PBO,223 名);94%的患者完成了研究。在第 1 天和第 12 周,与 IND+PBO 相比,IND+GLY 显著改善了谷值 FEV1,治疗差异分别为 74ml(95%CI46-101ml)和 64ml(95%CI28-99ml)(均 P<0.001)。与 IND+PBO 相比,IND+GLY 还显著改善了第 1 天和第 12 周时的餐后峰值 FEV1、FEV1 AUC30min-4h 和谷值 FVC(均 P<0.01)。与 IND+PBO 相比,TDI 焦点评分和 COPD 症状(能够进行日常活动的天数百分比和白天平均呼吸评分的基线变化)也有显著改善(均 P<0.05)。两组治疗的不良事件发生率相似。

结论

对于中重度 COPD 患者,IND 和 GLY 的每日联合给药与 IND 单药治疗相比,从第 1 天开始即可显著持续改善支气管扩张作用,并显著改善患者的中心结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/ef9f66c5820b/copd-9-215Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/266ef01f9dcc/copd-9-215Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/d9e4029a61bf/copd-9-215Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/b2feeced0926/copd-9-215Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/1233802e4bc8/copd-9-215Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/aee53bbac960/copd-9-215Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/ef9f66c5820b/copd-9-215Fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/266ef01f9dcc/copd-9-215Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/d9e4029a61bf/copd-9-215Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/b2feeced0926/copd-9-215Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/1233802e4bc8/copd-9-215Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/aee53bbac960/copd-9-215Fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd60/3940646/ef9f66c5820b/copd-9-215Fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of coadministration of once-daily indacaterol and glycopyrronium versus indacaterol alone in COPD patients: the GLOW6 study.在 COPD 患者中,每日一次茚达特罗和格隆溴铵联合用药与茚达特罗单药治疗的疗效和安全性:GLOW6 研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Feb 24;9:215-28. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S51592. eCollection 2014.
2
Efficacy and safety of indacaterol/glycopyrronium in Japanese patients with COPD: a subgroup analysis from the SHINE study.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵在日本慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:来自SHINE研究的亚组分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Oct 11;11:2543-2551. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S111408. eCollection 2016.
3
Efficacy and safety of QVA149 compared to the concurrent administration of its monocomponents indacaterol and glycopyrronium: the BEACON study.QVA149 与茚达特罗和格隆溴铵单药联合治疗的疗效和安全性比较:BEACON 研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013;8:501-8. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S49615. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
4
Indacaterol/glycopyrronium in symptomatic patients with COPD (GOLD B and GOLD D) versus salmeterol/fluticasone: ILLUMINATE/LANTERN pooled analysis.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(GOLD B级和GOLD D级)有症状患者与沙美特罗/氟替卡松的对比:ILLUMINATE/LANTERN汇总分析
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Dec 14;11:3189-3197. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S116786. eCollection 2016.
5
A randomized trial to determine the impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium on nighttime oxygenation and symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: the DuoSleep study.一项旨在确定茚达特罗/格隆溴铵对中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者夜间氧合及症状影响的随机试验:DuoSleep研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jan 9;14:199-210. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S184127. eCollection 2019.
6
Efficacy and safety of direct switch to indacaterol/glycopyrronium in patients with moderate COPD: the CRYSTAL open-label randomised trial.中度 COPD 患者直接换用茚达特罗/格隆溴铵的疗效和安全性:CRYSTAL 开放性随机试验。
Respir Res. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0622-x.
7
Cost-effectiveness of twice-daily indacaterol/glycopyrrolate inhalation powder for the treatment of moderate to severe COPD in the US.每日两次吸入茚达特罗/格隆溴铵粉剂治疗美国中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病的成本效益
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Nov 28;13:3867-3877. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S177097. eCollection 2018.
8
The impact of indacaterol/glycopyrronium fixed-dose combination versus tiotropium monotherapy on lung function and treatment preference: a randomized crossover study - the FAVOR study.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵固定剂量复方与噻托溴铵单药治疗对肺功能及治疗偏好的影响:一项随机交叉研究——FAVOR研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Dec 22;13:69-77. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S146189. eCollection 2018.
9
Indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus salmeterol/fluticasone in Asian patients with COPD at a high risk of exacerbations: results from the FLAME study.茚达特罗/格隆溴铵与沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗亚洲慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重高风险患者的疗效比较:FLAME研究结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Jan 19;12:339-349. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S125058. eCollection 2017.
10
Real-life effectiveness of indacaterol-glycopyrronium after switching from tiotropium or salmeterol/fluticasone therapy in patients with symptomatic COPD: the POWER study.在有症状的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,从噻托溴铵或沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗转换为茚达特罗-格隆溴铵后的实际疗效:POWER研究
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jan 18;14:249-260. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S185485. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Lung Hyperinflation as Treatable Trait in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.肺过度充气可作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的一种可治疗的特征:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jul 2;19:1561-1578. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S458324. eCollection 2024.
2
Real-World Safety and Efficacy of Glycopyrronium Bromide in Japanese Patients with COPD: A 52-Week Post-Marketing Surveillance.格隆溴铵在日本慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的真实世界安全性和有效性:一项52周的上市后监测
Open Respir Med J. 2022 Feb 8;16:e187430642112240. doi: 10.2174/18743064-v16-e2112240. eCollection 2022.
3
COPD and glycopyrronium responsiveness assessment: An appraisal.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of once-daily QVA149 compared with twice-daily salmeterol-fluticasone in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ILLUMINATE): a randomised, double-blind, parallel group study.每日一次 QVA149 与每日两次沙美特罗/氟替卡松治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(ILLUMINATE)的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机、双盲、平行分组研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Mar;1(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(12)70052-8. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
2
Dual bronchodilation with QVA149 reduces patient-reported dyspnoea in COPD: the BLAZE study.QVA149 双重支气管扩张作用可减轻 COPD 患者呼吸困难的报告:BLAZE 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2014 Jun;43(6):1599-609. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00124013. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
3
慢性阻塞性肺疾病与格隆溴铵反应性评估:一项评估。
Lung India. 2023 May-Jun;40(3):227-234. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_376_22.
4
Comparative Efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Other Bronchodilators for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与其他支气管扩张剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效比较:一项网络荟萃分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Nov;39(11):4961-5010. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02234-x. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
5
Benefits of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Compared with Tiotropium in Patients with COPD Receiving only LAMA at Baseline: Pooled Analysis of the TONADO and OTEMTO Studies.噻托溴铵/奥达特罗对比噻托溴铵在基线时仅接受 LAMA 治疗的 COPD 患者中的获益:TONADO 和 OTEMTO 研究的汇总分析。
Adv Ther. 2020 Aug;37(8):3485-3499. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01373-3. Epub 2020 May 27.
6
Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的药物治疗。美国胸科学会临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):e56-e69. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202003-0625ST.
7
Daytime symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的日间症状:系统评价。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2020 Feb 21;30(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41533-020-0163-5.
8
A Framework For Step Down Or Therapeutic Re-Organization For Withdrawal Of Inhaled Corticosteroids In Selected Patients With COPD: A Proposal For COPD Management.COPD 管理中选定 COPD 患者停用吸入性皮质类固醇的阶梯式降阶或治疗性重新调整框架:一项 COPD 管理建议。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Sep 23;14:2185-2193. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S216059. eCollection 2019.
9
Once daily long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists in a combined inhaler versus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.每日一次长效β2受体激动剂与长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂联合吸入器治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病对比安慰剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 6;3(3):CD012930. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012930.pub2.
10
The Cholinergic Pathways in Inflammation: A Potential Pharmacotherapeutic Target for COPD.炎症中的胆碱能通路:慢性阻塞性肺疾病潜在的药物治疗靶点
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Dec 3;9:1426. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01426. eCollection 2018.
Dual bronchodilation with QVA149 versus single bronchodilator therapy: the SHINE study.
QVA149 双重支气管扩张与单一支气管扩张剂治疗的比较:SHINE 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2013 Dec;42(6):1484-94. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00200212. Epub 2013 May 30.
4
Risk-to-benefit ratio of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入糖皮质激素的风险效益比。
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Mar;22(1):92-100. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00092.
5
Efficacy and safety of NVA237 versus placebo and tiotropium in patients with COPD: the GLOW2 study.NVA237 与安慰剂和噻托溴铵治疗 COPD 患者的疗效和安全性:GLOW2 研究。
Eur Respir J. 2012 Nov;40(5):1106-14. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00040712. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
6
Once-daily NVA237 improves exercise tolerance from the first dose in patients with COPD: the GLOW3 trial.每日一次 NVA237 可改善 COPD 患者从首次给药开始的运动耐量:GLOW3 试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:503-13. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S32451. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
7
Concurrent use of indacaterol plus tiotropium in patients with COPD provides superior bronchodilation compared with tiotropium alone: a randomised, double-blind comparison.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者联合使用茚达特罗和噻托溴铵可提供优于噻托溴铵单药的支气管扩张作用:一项随机、双盲比较。
Thorax. 2012 Sep;67(9):781-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201140. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
8
Efficacy and safety of once-daily NVA237 in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD: the GLOW1 trial.每日一次 NVA237 治疗中重度 COPD 患者的疗效和安全性:GLOW1 试验。
Respir Res. 2011 Dec 7;12(1):156. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-12-156.
9
Blinded 12-week comparison of once-daily indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中每日一次茚达特罗与噻托溴铵的 12 周双盲比较。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Oct;38(4):797-803. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00191810. Epub 2011 May 26.
10
Indacaterol once-daily provides superior efficacy to salmeterol twice-daily in COPD: a 12-week study.每日一次茚达特罗在 COPD 中提供优于每日两次沙美特罗的疗效:一项 12 周的研究。
Respir Med. 2011 May;105(5):719-26. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Mar 1.