Suppr超能文献

去甲肾上腺素基于体重给药与非基于体重给药对肥胖感染性休克患者达到目标平均动脉压时间的影响。

Impact of Norepinephrine Weight-Based Dosing Compared With Non-Weight-Based Dosing in Achieving Time to Goal Mean Arterial Pressure in Obese Patients With Septic Shock.

作者信息

Vadiei Nina, Daley Mitchell J, Murthy Manasa S, Shuman Carrie S

机构信息

1 University Medical Center Brackenridge, Austin, TX, USA.

2 Seton Medical Center Williamson, Round Rock, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Mar;51(3):194-202. doi: 10.1177/1060028016682030. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, a lack of standardization exists in norepinephrine dosing units, the first-line vasopressor for septic shock. Timely achievement of goal mean arterial pressure (MAP) is dependent on optimal vasopressor dosing.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if weight-based dosing (WBD) of norepinephrine leads to earlier time to goal MAP compared with non-WBD in obese patients with septic shock.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Patients had a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m and received norepinephrine for septic shock with either a non-WBD strategy (between December 2009 and January 2013) or WBD strategy (between January 2013 and December 2015). The primary outcome was time to goal MAP. Secondary outcomes were norepinephrine duration, dose requirements, and development of treatment-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 287 patients were included (WBD 144; non-WBD 143). There was no difference in median time to goal MAP (WBD 58 minutes, interquartile range [IQR] = 16.8-118.5, vs non-WBD 60 minutes, IQR = 17.5-193.5; P = 0.28). However, there was a difference in median cumulative norepinephrine dose (WBD 12.6 mg, IQR = 4.9-45.9, vs non-WBD 10.5 mg, IQR = 3.9-25.6; P = 0.04) and time to norepinephrine discontinuation (WBD 33 hours, IQR = 15-69, vs non-WBD 27 hours, IQR = 12-51; P = 0.03). There was no difference in rates of atrial fibrillation (WBD 15.3% vs non-WBD 23.7%; P = 0.07) or mortality (WBD 23.6% vs non-WBD 23.1%; P = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

WBD of norepinephrine does not achieve time to goal MAP earlier in obese patients with septic shock. However, WBD may lead to higher norepinephrine cumulative dose requirements and prolonged time until norepinephrine discontinuation.

摘要

背景

目前,作为脓毒性休克一线血管升压药的去甲肾上腺素给药单位缺乏标准化。及时达到目标平均动脉压(MAP)取决于最佳血管升压药剂量。

目的

确定在肥胖脓毒性休克患者中,与非基于体重给药(WBD)相比,基于体重给药(WBD)的去甲肾上腺素是否能使达到目标MAP的时间更早。

方法

这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究。患者体重指数(BMI)≥30kg/m²,因脓毒性休克接受去甲肾上腺素治疗,采用非WBD策略(2009年12月至2013年1月)或WBD策略(2013年1月至2015年12月)。主要结局是达到目标MAP的时间。次要结局是去甲肾上腺素使用持续时间、剂量需求以及治疗相关并发症的发生情况。

结果

共纳入287例患者(WBD组144例;非WBD组143例)。达到目标MAP的中位时间无差异(WBD组58分钟,四分位间距[IQR]=16.8 - 118.5,非WBD组60分钟,IQR = 17.5 - 193.5;P = 0.28)。然而,去甲肾上腺素累计中位剂量有差异(WBD组12.6mg,IQR = 4.9 - 45.9,非WBD组10.5mg,IQR = 3.9 - 25.6;P = 0.04)以及去甲肾上腺素停药时间有差异(WBD组33小时,IQR = 15 - 69,非WBD组27小时,IQR = 12 - 51;P = 0.03)。房颤发生率(WBD组15.3%对非WBD组23.7%;P = 0.07)或死亡率(WBD组23.6%对非WBD组23.1%;P = 0.92)无差异。

结论

在肥胖脓毒性休克患者中,去甲肾上腺素WBD并不能使达到目标MAP的时间更早。然而,WBD可能导致更高的去甲肾上腺素累计剂量需求以及去甲肾上腺素停药前时间延长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验