• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于体重与非基于体重的去甲肾上腺素给药方案达到感染性休克患者目标平均动脉压时剂量需求的评估

Evaluation of Dose Requirements Using Weight-Based versus Non-Weight-Based Dosing of Norepinephrine to Achieve a Goal Mean Arterial Pressure in Patients with Septic Shock.

作者信息

Selby Ashley R, Khan Nida S, Dadashian Tara, Hall Nd Ronald G

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1344. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041344.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12041344
PMID:36835880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9964536/
Abstract

No consensus exists regarding optimal dosing of norepinephrine in septic shock. We aimed to evaluate if weight-based dosing (WBD) lead to higher norepinephrine doses when achieving goal mean arterial pressure (MAP) than non-weight-based dosing (non-WBD). This was a retrospective cohort study conducted after standardization of norepinephrine dosing within a cardiopulmonary ICU. Patients received non-WBD prior to standardization (November 2018-October 2019) and WBD afterwards (November 2019-October 2020). The primary outcome was the norepinephrine dose needed to attain goal MAP. Secondary outcomes included time to goal MAP, duration of norepinephrine therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation, and treatment-related adverse effects. A total of 189 patients were included (WBD 97; non-WBD 92). There was a significantly lower norepinephrine dose at goal MAP (WBD 0.05, IQR 0.02, 0.07; non-WBD 0.07, IQR 0.05, 0.14; < 0.005) and initial norepinephrine dose (WBD 0.02, IQR 0.01, 0.05; non-WBD 0.06, 0.04, 0.12; < 0.005) in the WBD group. No difference was observed in achievement of goal MAP (WBD 73%; non-WBD 78%; = 0.09) or time until goal MAP (WBD 18, IQR 0, 60; non-WBD 30, IQR 14, 60; = 0.84). WBD may lead to lower norepinephrine doses. Both strategies achieved goal MAP with no significant difference in time to goal.

摘要

关于脓毒性休克中去甲肾上腺素的最佳剂量,目前尚无共识。我们旨在评估基于体重的给药方式(WBD)在达到目标平均动脉压(MAP)时是否比非基于体重的给药方式(非WBD)导致更高的去甲肾上腺素剂量。这是一项在心肺重症监护病房内对去甲肾上腺素给药进行标准化后开展的回顾性队列研究。患者在标准化之前(2018年11月至2019年10月)接受非WBD,之后(2019年11月至2020年10月)接受WBD。主要结局是达到目标MAP所需的去甲肾上腺素剂量。次要结局包括达到目标MAP的时间、去甲肾上腺素治疗持续时间、机械通气持续时间以及治疗相关不良反应。总共纳入了189例患者(WBD组97例;非WBD组92例)。在目标MAP时,WBD组的去甲肾上腺素剂量显著更低(WBD组0.05,四分位间距0.02,0.07;非WBD组0.07,四分位间距0.05,0.14;<0.005),初始去甲肾上腺素剂量也更低(WBD组0.02,四分位间距0.01,0.05;非WBD组0.06,四分位间距0.04,0.12;<0.005)。在达到目标MAP方面(WBD组73%;非WBD组78%;P=0.09)或直至达到目标MAP的时间方面(WBD组18,四分位间距0,60;非WBD组30,四分位间距14,60;P=0.84)未观察到差异。WBD可能导致更低的去甲肾上腺素剂量。两种策略均能达到目标MAP,在达到目标的时间上无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ac/9964536/d86b9ef97c9d/jcm-12-01344-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ac/9964536/d86b9ef97c9d/jcm-12-01344-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53ac/9964536/d86b9ef97c9d/jcm-12-01344-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Dose Requirements Using Weight-Based versus Non-Weight-Based Dosing of Norepinephrine to Achieve a Goal Mean Arterial Pressure in Patients with Septic Shock.使用基于体重与非基于体重的去甲肾上腺素给药方案达到感染性休克患者目标平均动脉压时剂量需求的评估
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1344. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041344.
2
Impact of Norepinephrine Weight-Based Dosing Compared With Non-Weight-Based Dosing in Achieving Time to Goal Mean Arterial Pressure in Obese Patients With Septic Shock.去甲肾上腺素基于体重给药与非基于体重给药对肥胖感染性休克患者达到目标平均动脉压时间的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Mar;51(3):194-202. doi: 10.1177/1060028016682030. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
3
Implementation and Evaluation of Weight-Based Vasopressors in Intensive Care Units.重症监护病房中基于体重的血管升压药的应用与评估
J Pharm Technol. 2024 Feb;40(1):23-29. doi: 10.1177/87551225231217905. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
4
Exploration of Norepinephrine Dose-Capping Practices: Report From an International, Interprofessional Survey of Critical Care Clinicians.去甲肾上腺素剂量封顶实践探索:一项针对重症监护临床医生的国际跨专业调查的报告。
J Pharm Pract. 2024 Oct;37(5):1132-1140. doi: 10.1177/08971900241228330. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
A comparison of initial monotherapy with norepinephrine versus vasopressin for resuscitation in septic shock.比较脓毒性休克时以去甲肾上腺素与血管加压素进行初始单一疗法的复苏效果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Mar;47(3):301-10. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R442. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
6
Efficacy and Safety of the Early Addition of Vasopressin to Norepinephrine in Septic Shock.早期应用血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素治疗脓毒性休克的疗效和安全性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):910-916. doi: 10.1177/0885066617725255. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
7
A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients.危重症患者中肾上腺素与去甲肾上腺素的比较。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Dec;34(12):2226-34. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1219-0. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
8
Prescribing of Pressor Agents in Septic Shock: A Survey of Critical Care Pharmacists.脓毒性休克中升压药的处方:重症监护药剂师的一项调查。
J Pharm Technol. 2019 Oct;35(5):187-193. doi: 10.1177/8755122519846164. Epub 2019 May 8.
9
Effect of Body Weight on Hemodynamic Response in Patients Receiving Fixed-Dose Vasopressin for Septic Shock.体重对接受固定剂量血管加压素治疗感染性休克患者血流动力学反应的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;50(10):816-23. doi: 10.1177/1060028016656384. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
10
Impact of Norepinephrine Weight-Based Dosing Compared With Non-Weight-Based Dosing in Achieving Time to Goal Mean Arterial Pressure in Obese Patients With Septic Shock.与非体重给药相比,基于体重的去甲肾上腺素给药对肥胖脓毒症休克患者达到目标平均动脉压时间的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Jul;51(7):614-616. doi: 10.1177/1060028017694376. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation and Evaluation of Weight-Based Vasopressors in Intensive Care Units.重症监护病房中基于体重的血管升压药的应用与评估
J Pharm Technol. 2024 Feb;40(1):23-29. doi: 10.1177/87551225231217905. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
2
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Graded Dose-Response Study of Norepinephrine Administration for Prevention of Post-Spinal Hypotension during Elective Cesarean Delivery.去甲肾上腺素预防择期剖宫产术中脊髓低血压的随机、双盲、剂量反应分级研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 10;12(20):6437. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206437.

本文引用的文献

1
Prescribing of Pressor Agents in Septic Shock: A Survey of Critical Care Pharmacists.脓毒性休克中升压药的处方:重症监护药剂师的一项调查。
J Pharm Technol. 2019 Oct;35(5):187-193. doi: 10.1177/8755122519846164. Epub 2019 May 8.
2
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
3
The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research.
eICU 协作研究数据库,一个免费的多中心重症监护研究数据库。
Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Weight-Based Norepinephrine Dosing in Underweight and Morbidly Obese Patients: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.体重指导下给予去甲肾上腺素在低体重和病态肥胖患者中的临床结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):554-561. doi: 10.1177/0885066618768180. Epub 2018 Apr 8.
5
Evaluating the impact of obesity on safety and efficacy of weight-based norepinephrine dosing in septic shock: A single-center, retrospective study.评估肥胖对脓毒性休克中基于体重的去甲肾上腺素给药安全性和有效性的影响:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Aug;41:104-108. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
6
Impact of Norepinephrine Weight-Based Dosing Compared With Non-Weight-Based Dosing in Achieving Time to Goal Mean Arterial Pressure in Obese Patients With Septic Shock.去甲肾上腺素基于体重给药与非基于体重给药对肥胖感染性休克患者达到目标平均动脉压时间的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Mar;51(3):194-202. doi: 10.1177/1060028016682030. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
7
Norepinephrine Dosing in Obese and Nonobese Patients With Septic Shock.肥胖与非肥胖感染性休克患者的去甲肾上腺素给药剂量
Am J Crit Care. 2016 Jan;25(1):27-32. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2016667.
8
Mortality benefit of vasopressor and inotropic agents in septic shock: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管加压药和正性肌力药物在感染性休克中的死亡率获益:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
9
Clinical characteristics, sepsis interventions and outcomes in the obese patients with septic shock: an international multicenter cohort study.肥胖性感染性休克患者的临床特征、脓毒症干预措施及预后:一项国际多中心队列研究
Crit Care. 2013 Apr 17;17(2):R72. doi: 10.1186/cc12680.
10
Interplay between adipose tissue and blood vessels in obesity and vascular dysfunction.肥胖与血管功能障碍中脂肪组织与血管的相互作用。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2013 Mar;14(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s11154-012-9230-8.