• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较脓毒性休克时以去甲肾上腺素与血管加压素进行初始单一疗法的复苏效果。

A comparison of initial monotherapy with norepinephrine versus vasopressin for resuscitation in septic shock.

机构信息

Critical Care, Department of Pharmacy, Seton Healthcare Family, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Mar;47(3):301-10. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R442. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1345/aph.1R442
PMID:23447481
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early goal-directed therapy is a time-sensitive therapeutic algorithm with a tiered approach to target hypoperfusion and cardiovascular collapse within the first 6 hours of septic shock. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend norepinephrine or dopamine as the initial vasoactive agent for resuscitation in septic shock, reserving the administration of vasopressin as adjunctive therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether vasopressin was noninferior to norepinephrine as the initial vasopressor to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) goal in the first 6 hours of shock onset.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated adults who received monotherapy with either norepinephrine or vasopressin as initial vasoactive therapy for the management of septic shock. Patients were excluded if the treatment arm was not monotherapy, if they were admitted to a cardiology or cardiothoracic surgery service, or if they lacked a comparator-based 1:1 frequency matching.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were included, 65 in each treatment arm. The proportion of patients who achieved a goal MAP in the vasopressin group was 63% (95% CI 51%-75%) and was 67.7% (95% CI 56%-79%) in the norepinephrine group. This observed difference between goal MAP attainment did not exceed the predefined noninferiority margin of -25% (CI for 4.7% difference -21.2% to 12%), suggesting noninferiority of vasopressin. No significant difference was identified between vasopressin and norepinephrine for final mean (SD) MAP achieved (75 [9.6] and 76.0 [8.2] mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.06) or the mean total change from baseline MAP to goal (14.1 [8.4] and 15.1 [9.1] mm Hg, respectively; p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Vasopressin was noninferior to norepinephrine for the achievement of a MAP goal in the first 6 hours from onset of septic shock. Further prospective analysis is warranted; however, the results are useful for consideration of alternative vasopressors in the setting of drug shortages.

摘要

背景

早期目标导向治疗是一种时间敏感的治疗算法,采用分层方法在脓毒性休克的最初 6 小时内针对低灌注和心血管崩溃。《拯救脓毒症运动指南》建议去甲肾上腺素或多巴胺作为脓毒性休克复苏的初始血管活性药物,将血管加压素作为辅助治疗保留。

目的

确定血管加压素是否作为初始升压药与去甲肾上腺素一样能在休克发作的最初 6 小时内达到平均动脉压(MAP)目标。

方法

本回顾性队列研究评估了接受去甲肾上腺素或血管加压素单药治疗作为脓毒性休克管理初始血管活性治疗的成年人。如果治疗臂不是单药治疗,如果他们被收住在心脏病学或心胸外科服务,如果他们缺乏基于比较器的 1:1 频率匹配,则将患者排除在外。

结果

共纳入 130 例患者,每组 65 例。血管加压素组达到目标 MAP 的患者比例为 63%(95%CI 51%-75%),去甲肾上腺素组为 67.7%(95%CI 56%-79%)。观察到的目标 MAP 达标差异未超过预设的非劣效性边界-25%(差异的 95%CI 为-21.2%至 12%),提示血管加压素非劣效。血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素在最终平均(SD)MAP 达到(分别为 75[9.6]和 76.0[8.2]mmHg;p=0.06)或从基线 MAP 到目标的平均总变化(分别为 14.1[8.4]和 15.1[9.1]mmHg;p=0.6)方面均无显著差异。

结论

血管加压素在脓毒性休克发作后的最初 6 小时内达到 MAP 目标的非劣效性优于去甲肾上腺素。需要进一步进行前瞻性分析;然而,这些结果对于在药物短缺的情况下考虑替代血管加压素是有用的。

相似文献

1
A comparison of initial monotherapy with norepinephrine versus vasopressin for resuscitation in septic shock.比较脓毒性休克时以去甲肾上腺素与血管加压素进行初始单一疗法的复苏效果。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Mar;47(3):301-10. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R442. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Efficacy and Safety of the Early Addition of Vasopressin to Norepinephrine in Septic Shock.早期应用血管加压素联合去甲肾上腺素治疗脓毒性休克的疗效和安全性。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):910-916. doi: 10.1177/0885066617725255. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
3
Prospective Open-label Trial of Early Concomitant Vasopressin and Norepinephrine Therapy versus Initial Norepinephrine Monotherapy in Septic Shock.前瞻性、开放性标签试验:早期联合使用血管加压素和去甲肾上腺素与脓毒性休克初始去甲肾上腺素单药治疗的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 May;38(5):531-538. doi: 10.1002/phar.2105. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Does body weight impact the efficacy of vasopressin therapy in the management of septic shock?体重会影响血管加压素治疗脓毒性休克的疗效吗?
J Crit Care. 2012 Jun;27(3):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
5
Effects of continuous vasopressin infusion in patients with septic shock.持续输注血管加压素对感染性休克患者的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(7-8):1117-22. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D513. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
6
Effect of Early Vasopressin vs Norepinephrine on Kidney Failure in Patients With Septic Shock: The VANISH Randomized Clinical Trial.血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克患者肾衰竭影响的随机临床试验:VANISH 研究。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 2;316(5):509-18. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10485.
7
Hemodynamic Instability Secondary to Vasopressin Withdrawal in Septic Shock.感染性休克中血管加压素停药引起的血流动力学不稳定。
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):761-765. doi: 10.1177/0885066617716396. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
8
Effect of Body Weight on Hemodynamic Response in Patients Receiving Fixed-Dose Vasopressin for Septic Shock.体重对接受固定剂量血管加压素治疗感染性休克患者血流动力学反应的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;50(10):816-23. doi: 10.1177/1060028016656384. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
Fixed-dose vasopressin compared with titrated dopamine and norepinephrine as initial vasopressor therapy for septic shock.与滴定剂量的多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素相比,固定剂量血管加压素作为脓毒性休克初始血管升压药治疗的疗效比较
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Aug;24(8):1002-12. doi: 10.1592/phco.24.11.1002.36139.
10
Impact of Norepinephrine Weight-Based Dosing Compared With Non-Weight-Based Dosing in Achieving Time to Goal Mean Arterial Pressure in Obese Patients With Septic Shock.去甲肾上腺素基于体重给药与非基于体重给药对肥胖感染性休克患者达到目标平均动脉压时间的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Mar;51(3):194-202. doi: 10.1177/1060028016682030. Epub 2016 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Norepinephrine Onset Time and Mortality in Patients with Septic Shock Treated in the Emergency Department.急诊科治疗的感染性休克患者去甲肾上腺素起效时间与死亡率
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 26;14(17):6025. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176025.
2
Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期管理:韩国临床实践指南
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Nov;39(4):445-472. doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
3
Perceptions regarding vasopressin use and practices in septic shock, and cost containment strategies.
关于脓毒性休克中血管加压素使用和实践的认知以及成本控制策略。
J Am Coll Clin Pharm. 2019 Jun;2(3):257-267. doi: 10.1002/jac5.1079. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
4
Should we initiate vasopressors earlier in patients with septic shock: A mini systemic review.对于感染性休克患者,我们是否应更早开始使用血管加压药:一项小型系统评价。
World J Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 9;12(4):204-216. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.204.
5
Vasopressin versus norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor in septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.血管加压素与去甲肾上腺素作为感染性休克一线血管活性药物的系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Transl Res. 2022 May 25;8(3):185-199. eCollection 2022 Jun 29.
6
Vasopressin in vasoplegic shock: A systematic review.血管加压素在血管麻痹性休克中的应用:一项系统评价。
World J Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec 18;9(5):88-98. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v9.i5.88.
7
Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脓毒性休克患者去甲肾上腺素起始时机:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2020 Aug 6;24(1):488. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03204-x.
8
Did the beneficial renal outcomes with vasopressin VANISH?加压素带来的有益肾脏结局消失了吗?
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Oct;4(Suppl 1):S67. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.10.59.
9
Vasopressor and Inotropic Management Of Patients With Septic Shock.脓毒性休克患者的血管升压药与正性肌力药治疗
P T. 2015 Jul;40(7):438-50.
10
Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis.比较去甲肾上腺素与血管加压素治疗脓毒性休克患者的临床试验:一项荟萃分析。
Mil Med Res. 2014 May 1;1:6. doi: 10.1186/2054-9369-1-6. eCollection 2014.