Kuczynski Elizabeth A, Kerbel Robert S
Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, S-Wing, Room S217, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Chin J Cancer. 2016 Nov 25;35(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40880-016-0162-7.
The reason why tumors generally have a modest or transient response to antiangiogenic therapy is not well understood. This poses a major challenge for sorafenib treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) where alternate therapies are lacking. We recently published a paper entitled "Co-option of liver vessels and not sprouting angiogenesis drives acquired sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma" in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, providing a potential explanation for this limited benefit. We found that in mice bearing HCCs that had acquired resistance to sorafenib, tumors had switched from using angiogenesis for growth to co-opting the liver vasculature by becoming more invasive. Accumulating evidence suggests that many human tumor types may use vessel co-option, which has profound implications for the use of anti-angiogenic agents for cancer treatment.
肿瘤对抗血管生成疗法通常只有适度或短暂反应的原因尚未完全明确。这给索拉非尼治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)带来了重大挑战,因为目前缺乏替代疗法。我们最近在《国家癌症研究所杂志》上发表了一篇题为《肝细胞癌中肝血管的利用而非新生血管生成驱动了索拉非尼获得性耐药》的论文,为这种有限的疗效提供了一种可能的解释。我们发现,在对索拉非尼产生耐药性的肝癌小鼠模型中,肿瘤已从利用血管生成来生长转变为通过增强侵袭性来利用肝脏脉管系统。越来越多的证据表明,许多人类肿瘤类型可能会利用血管利用,这对使用抗血管生成药物治疗癌症具有深远影响。