Kuczynski Elizabeth A, Yin Melissa, Bar-Zion Avinoam, Lee Christina R, Butz Henriett, Man Shan, Daley Frances, Vermeulen Peter B, Yousef George M, Foster F Stuart, Reynolds Andrew R, Kerbel Robert S
Affiliations of authors: Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (EAK, FSF, RSK); Physical Sciences Platform (MY, FSF) and Biological Sciences Platform (CRL, SM, RSK), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (ABZ); Keenan Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada (HB, GMY); The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Mary-Jean Mitchell Green Building, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK (FD, PBV, ARR); Translational Cancer Research Unit, GZA Hospitals St. Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium (PBV).
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr 8;108(8). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw030. Print 2016 Aug.
The anti-angiogenic Sorafenib is the only approved systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, acquired resistance limits its efficacy. An emerging theory to explain intrinsic resistance to other anti-angiogenic drugs is 'vessel co-option,' ie, the ability of tumors to hijack the existing vasculature in organs such as the lungs or liver, thus limiting the need for sprouting angiogenesis. Vessel co-option has not been evaluated as a potential mechanism for acquired resistance to anti-angiogenic agents.
To study sorafenib resistance mechanisms, we used an orthotopic human HCC model (n = 4-11 per group), where tumor cells are tagged with a secreted protein biomarker to monitor disease burden and response to therapy. Histopathology, vessel perfusion assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and miRNA sequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were used to monitor changes in tumor biology.
While sorafenib initially inhibited angiogenesis and stabilized tumor growth, no angiogenic 'rebound' effect was observed during development of resistance unless therapy was stopped. Instead, resistant tumors became more locally infiltrative, which facilitated extensive incorporation of liver parenchyma and the co-option of liver-associated vessels. Up to 75% (±10.9%) of total vessels were provided by vessel co-option in resistant tumors relative to 23.3% (±10.3%) in untreated controls. miRNA sequencing implicated pro-invasive signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal-like transition during resistance development while functional imaging further supported a shift from angiogenesis to vessel co-option.
This is the first documentation of vessel co-option as a mechanism of acquired resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy and could have important implications including the potential therapeutic benefits of targeting vessel co-option in conjunction with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling.
抗血管生成药物索拉非尼是唯一被批准用于晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的全身治疗药物。然而,获得性耐药限制了其疗效。一种新兴的理论来解释对其他抗血管生成药物的内在耐药性是“血管共选择”,即肿瘤劫持肺或肝脏等器官中现有脉管系统的能力,从而限制了对新生血管生成的需求。血管共选择尚未被评估为抗血管生成药物获得性耐药的潜在机制。
为了研究索拉非尼的耐药机制,我们使用了原位人肝癌模型(每组n = 4 - 11),其中肿瘤细胞用一种分泌性蛋白质生物标志物标记,以监测疾病负担和对治疗的反应。组织病理学、通过超声造影评估的血管灌注以及miRNA测序和定量实时聚合酶链反应被用于监测肿瘤生物学的变化。
虽然索拉非尼最初抑制血管生成并稳定肿瘤生长,但在耐药发展过程中未观察到血管生成的“反弹”效应,除非停止治疗。相反,耐药肿瘤的局部浸润性更强,这促进了肝实质的广泛纳入以及肝相关血管的共选择。相对于未治疗对照组的23.3%(±10.3%),耐药肿瘤中高达75%(±10.9%)的血管是通过血管共选择提供的。miRNA测序表明在耐药发展过程中存在促侵袭信号和上皮-间质样转化,而功能成像进一步支持了从血管生成向血管共选择的转变。
这是首次将血管共选择记录为抗血管生成治疗获得性耐药的机制,可能具有重要意义,包括联合靶向血管共选择和血管内皮生长因子受体信号传导的潜在治疗益处。