Shaheen Luke A, Valero Michelle D, Liberman M Charles
Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;16(6):727-45. doi: 10.1007/s10162-015-0539-3. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
Listeners with normal audiometric thresholds can still have suprathreshold deficits, for example, in the ability to discriminate sounds in complex acoustic scenes. One likely source of these deficits is cochlear neuropathy, a loss of auditory nerve (AN) fibers without hair cell damage, which can occur due to both aging and moderate acoustic overexposure. Since neuropathy can affect up to 50 % of AN fibers, its impact on suprathreshold hearing is likely profound, but progress is hindered by lack of a robust non-invasive test of neuropathy in humans. Reduction of suprathreshold auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) can be used to quantify neuropathy in inbred mice. However, ABR amplitudes are highly variable in humans, and thus more challenging to use. Since noise-induced neuropathy is selective for AN fibers with high thresholds, and because phase locking to temporal envelopes is particularly strong in these fibers, the envelope following response (EFR) might be a more robust measure. We compared EFRs to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones and ABRs to tone-pips in mice following a neuropathic noise exposure. EFR amplitude, EFR phase-locking value, and ABR amplitude were all reduced in noise-exposed mice. However, the changes in EFRs were more robust: the variance was smaller, thus inter-group differences were clearer. Optimum detection of neuropathy was achieved with high modulation frequencies and moderate levels. Analysis of group delays was used to confirm that the AN population was dominating the responses at these high modulation frequencies. Application of these principles in clinical testing can improve the differential diagnosis of sensorineural hearing loss.
听力测定阈值正常的听众在超阈值方面仍可能存在缺陷,例如在复杂声学场景中辨别声音的能力。这些缺陷的一个可能来源是耳蜗神经病变,即听觉神经(AN)纤维丧失而毛细胞未受损,这可能由于衰老和适度的声学过度暴露而发生。由于神经病变可影响多达50%的AN纤维,其对超阈值听力的影响可能很大,但由于缺乏一种可靠的人类神经病变非侵入性检测方法,进展受到阻碍。超阈值听觉脑干反应(ABR)的降低可用于量化近交系小鼠的神经病变。然而,ABR振幅在人类中变化很大,因此使用起来更具挑战性。由于噪声引起的神经病变对高阈值的AN纤维具有选择性,并且由于这些纤维对时间包络的锁相特别强,包络跟随反应(EFR)可能是一种更可靠的测量方法。我们比较了神经病变性噪声暴露后小鼠对正弦调幅音的EFR和对短纯音的ABR。噪声暴露小鼠的EFR振幅、EFR锁相值和ABR振幅均降低。然而,EFR的变化更为显著:方差更小,因此组间差异更明显。在高调制频率和中等水平下实现了对神经病变的最佳检测。通过分析群延迟来确认在这些高调制频率下AN群体主导了反应。将这些原理应用于临床测试可以改善感音神经性听力损失的鉴别诊断。