Tsuboi Kouki, Kaneko Yosuke, Nagatomo Takamasa, Fujii Rika, Hanamura Toru, Gohno Tatsuyuki, Yamaguchi Yuri, Niwa Toshifumi, Hayashi Shin-Ichi
Department of Molecular and Functional Dynamics, Graduate Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Department of Molecular and Functional Dynamics, Graduate Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Surgical Oncology, Graduate Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Mar;167:115-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
Approximately 70% of breast cancers express estrogen receptor α (ERα), which plays critical roles in breast cancer development. Fulvestrant has been effectively used to treat ERα-positive breast cancer, although resistance remains a critical problem. To elucidate the mechanism of resistance to fulvestrant, we established fulvestrant-resistant cell-lines named MFR (MCF-7 derived fulvestrant resistance) and TFR (T-47D derived fulvestrant resistance) from the ERα-positive luminal breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T-47D, respectively. Both fulvestrant-resistant cell lines lost sensitivity to estrogen and anti-estrogens. We observed diminished ERα expression at both the protein and mRNA levels. To address the mechanism of gene expression regulation, we examined epigenetic alteration, especially the DNA methylation level of ERα gene promoters. MFR cells displayed high methylation levels upstream of the ERα gene, whereas no change in DNA methylation was observed in TFR cells. Hence, we examined the gene expression plasticity of ERα, as there are differences in its reversibility following fulvestrant withdrawal. ERα gene expression was not restored in MFR cells, and alternative intracellular phosphorylation signals were activated. By contrast, TFR cells exhibited plasticity of ERα gene expression and ERα-dependent growth; moreover, these cells were resensitized to estrogen and anti-estrogens. The difference in epigenetic regulation among individual cells might explain the difference in the plasticity of ERα expression. We also identified an MFR cell-activating HER/Src-Akt/MAPK pathway; thus, the specific inhibitors effectively blocked MFR cell growth. This finding implies the presence of multiple fulvestrant resistance mechanisms and suggests that the optimal therapies differ among individual tumors as a result of differing epigenetic mechanisms regulating ERα gene expression.
大约70%的乳腺癌表达雌激素受体α(ERα),其在乳腺癌发展中起关键作用。氟维司群已被有效用于治疗ERα阳性乳腺癌,尽管耐药性仍然是一个关键问题。为了阐明对氟维司群耐药的机制,我们分别从ERα阳性的管腔型乳腺癌细胞系MCF-7和T-47D建立了名为MFR(MCF-7衍生的氟维司群耐药)和TFR(T-47D衍生的氟维司群耐药)的氟维司群耐药细胞系。两种氟维司群耐药细胞系均对雌激素和抗雌激素失去敏感性。我们在蛋白质和mRNA水平均观察到ERα表达减少。为了探讨基因表达调控机制,我们检测了表观遗传改变,尤其是ERα基因启动子的DNA甲基化水平。MFR细胞在ERα基因上游显示出高甲基化水平,而TFR细胞未观察到DNA甲基化变化。因此,我们研究了ERα的基因表达可塑性,因为在撤用氟维司群后其可逆性存在差异。MFR细胞中ERα基因表达未恢复,并且激活了替代性细胞内磷酸化信号。相比之下,TFR细胞表现出ERα基因表达和ERα依赖性生长的可塑性;此外,这些细胞对雌激素和抗雌激素重新敏感。单个细胞之间表观遗传调控的差异可能解释了ERα表达可塑性的差异。我们还在MFR细胞中鉴定出激活HER/Src-Akt/MAPK途径;因此,特异性抑制剂有效阻断了MFR细胞生长。这一发现意味着存在多种氟维司群耐药机制,并表明由于调节ERα基因表达的表观遗传机制不同,个体肿瘤的最佳治疗方法也不同。