Papadakaki Maria, Ferraro Ottavia Eleonora, Orsi Chiara, Otte Dietmar, Tzamalouka Georgia, von-der-Geest Marco, Lajunen Timo, Özkan Türker, Morandi Anna, Sarris Markos, Pierrakos George, Chliaoutakis Joannes
Laboratory of Health and Road Safety, Department of Social Work, School of Health and Social Welfare, Technological Educational Institute of Crete, Estavromenos, P.C. 71004, Heraklion, Greece.
Centre of Study and Research on Road Safety, Medical School, University of Pavia, Via Forlanini 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
The current study aimed to follow-up a group of road crash survivors for one year and assesses the impact of injury on their psychological and physical condition. All crash survivors that were admitted to the intensive or sub-intensive care units of selected hospitals in Greece, Germany and Italy over one year period (2013-2014), were invited to participate in the study and were interviewed at three different time-points as follows: (a) at one month (baseline data), (b) at six months, and (c) at twelve months. The study used widely recommended classifications for injury severity (AIS, MAIS) and standardized health outcome measures such as the Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS 2.0) to measure disability, "Impact of Event Scale" (IES-R) to measure Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D Scale) to measure depression. A total of 120 patients were enrolled in the study in all the partner countries and 93 completed all follow up questionnaires. The risk of physical disability was 4.57 times higher [CI 1.98-2.27] at the first follow up and 3.43 times higher [CI 1.43-9.42] at the second follow up as compared with the time before the injury. There was a 79% and an 88% lower risk of depression at the first and the second follow up respectively, as compared with the baseline time. There was also a 72% lower risk of Post-Traumatic Stress at the second follow up as compared with the baseline time. A number of factors relevant to the individuals, the road crash and the injury, were shown to distinguish those at higher risk of long-lasting disability and psychological distress including age, marital status, type of road user, severity and type of the injury, past emotional reaction to distress. The study highlights the importance of a comprehensive and holistic understanding of the impact of injury on an individual and further underlines the importance of screening and treating psychological comorbidities in injury in a timely manner.
本研究旨在对一组道路交通事故幸存者进行为期一年的随访,并评估损伤对其心理和身体状况的影响。在一年期间(2013 - 2014年),所有入住希腊、德国和意大利选定医院重症或亚重症监护病房的事故幸存者均受邀参与本研究,并在以下三个不同时间点接受访谈:(a) 一个月时(基线数据),(b) 六个月时,以及(c) 十二个月时。该研究采用了广泛推荐的损伤严重程度分类(AIS、MAIS)以及标准化的健康结局测量指标,如用于测量残疾的《残疾评估量表II》(WHODAS 2.0)、用于测量创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的“事件影响量表”(IES - R)、用于测量抑郁的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES - D量表)。所有伙伴国家共有120名患者参与了该研究,其中93名完成了所有随访问卷。与受伤前相比,首次随访时身体残疾风险高4.57倍[CI 1.98 - 2.27],第二次随访时高3.43倍[CI 1.43 - 9.42]。与基线时间相比,首次和第二次随访时抑郁风险分别降低了79%和88%。与基线时间相比,第二次随访时创伤后应激风险也降低了72%。一些与个体、道路交通事故和损伤相关的因素显示,它们能够区分出那些长期残疾和心理困扰风险较高的人,包括年龄、婚姻状况、道路使用者类型、损伤的严重程度和类型、过去对困扰的情绪反应。该研究强调了全面、整体理解损伤对个体影响的重要性,并进一步强调了及时筛查和治疗损伤中并发心理疾病的重要性。