VanKim Nicole A, Austin S Bryn, Jun Hee-Jin, Hu Frank B, Corliss Heather L
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Mar;117(3):386-395. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2016.09.028. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
Lesbian and bisexual women are at greater risk of being obese than heterosexual women; however, there is little research on dietary intake among lesbian and bisexual women.
This study estimated differences in dietary quality and intake during adulthood comparing heterosexual women to lesbian and bisexual women.
Biennial mailed questionnaires were used to collect data from a cohort between 1991 and 2011. Heterosexual-identified women were the reference group.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: More than 100,000 female registered nurses in the United States, aged 24 to 44 years, were recruited in 1989 to participate in the Nurses' Health Study II. More than 90% of the original sample are currently active in the study. About 1.3% identified as lesbian or bisexual.
Dietary measures were calculated from a 133-item food frequency questionnaire administered every 4 years. Measures included diet quality (Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension); calorie, fat, and fiber intake; and glycemic load and index.
Multivariable adjusted repeated measures linear regression models were fit.
On average, lesbian and bisexual women reported better diet quality (P<0.001) and diets lower in glycemic index (P<0.001) than heterosexual women. In the whole cohort, diet quality scores increased as participants aged, and were lower among women living in rural compared to urban regions. Comparisons in dietary intake across sexual orientation groups were generally similar across age and rurality status. However, differences between lesbian and heterosexual women in Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 were larger during younger compared to older ages, suggesting that diet quality estimates among sexual orientation groups converged as women aged.
Lesbian and bisexual women reported higher diet quality than heterosexuals. More research examining how diet affects risk for chronic conditions, such as diabetes, among sexual minorities is needed. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, disordered eating behaviors, and psychosocial and minority stress should be explored as potential contributors to higher rates of obesity among sexual minority women.
女同性恋和双性恋女性比异性恋女性肥胖风险更高;然而,关于女同性恋和双性恋女性饮食摄入的研究很少。
本研究比较了成年期异性恋女性与女同性恋和双性恋女性在饮食质量和摄入量上的差异。
1991年至2011年间,通过每两年邮寄一次问卷的方式从一个队列中收集数据。以自我认定为异性恋的女性作为参照组。
参与者/研究背景:1989年招募了美国100,000多名年龄在24至44岁之间的女性注册护士参与护士健康研究II。超过90%的原始样本目前仍积极参与该研究。约1.3%的人自我认定为女同性恋或双性恋。
饮食指标通过每4年进行一次的133项食物频率问卷来计算。指标包括饮食质量(2010年替代健康饮食指数和防治高血压饮食方法);卡路里、脂肪和纤维摄入量;以及血糖负荷和指数。
采用多变量调整重复测量线性回归模型。
平均而言,女同性恋和双性恋女性报告的饮食质量更好(P<0.001),血糖指数更低(P<0.001)。在整个队列中,饮食质量得分随着参与者年龄增长而增加,农村地区女性的得分低于城市地区。不同性取向组之间饮食摄入量的比较在年龄和农村/城市状况方面总体相似。然而,与年长女性相比,年轻女性中女同性恋和异性恋女性在2010年替代健康饮食指数上的差异更大,这表明随着女性年龄增长,不同性取向组之间的饮食质量估计值趋于一致。
女同性恋和双性恋女性报告的饮食质量高于异性恋女性。需要更多研究来探讨饮食如何影响性少数群体中糖尿病等慢性病的风险。应探讨身体活动、久坐行为、饮食失调行为以及心理社会和少数群体压力,作为性少数群体女性肥胖率较高的潜在因素。