Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Division of Adolescent/Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Jun;32(6):645-651. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01418-0. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
Extensive prior research has shown that sexual minority women are more likely to have a number of cancer risk factors, thereby putting them at higher risk for cancer than heterosexual women. However, there has been little research evaluating the association between sexual orientation and diet quality.
Data come from participants (aged 24-54 years) enrolled in Nurses' Health Study 3, an ongoing, U.S.-based cohort study (N = 15,941). We measured diet using recommendations from the Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and American Health Association (AHA) 2020 Strategic Impact Goals.
We found limited evidence of differences across diet quality by sexual orientation. When examining predicted DASH scores, mostly heterosexual [predicted mean score (95% confidence interval), 24.0 (23.8, 24.3)] and lesbian [24.3 (23.8, 24.9)] women had healthier predicted DASH scores than the reference group of completely heterosexual women with no same-sex partners [23.6 (23.5, 23.7)]. Even though certain sexual minority women had overall healthier predict DASH scores, their consumption of certain food groups-low-fat dairy and fruit-was lower than completely heterosexual women with no same-sex partners. When measuring AHA scores, most sexual minority groups (completely heterosexual women with same-sex partners, mostly heterosexual women, and lesbian women) had higher diet quality compared to the reference group of completely heterosexual women with no same-sex partners.
Sexual minority women, particularly mostly heterosexual women and lesbian women, had healthier diet quality than completely heterosexual women with no same-sex partners. These data suggest that cancer risk factors (e.g., smoking, drinking, and inactivity) other than diet would drive higher cancer rates among sexual minority compared to heterosexual women. Nonetheless, it is critical for all women to improve their diet quality since diet quality was poor among participants of all sexual orientations.
大量先前的研究表明,性少数群体女性更有可能存在多种癌症风险因素,因此她们患癌症的风险高于异性恋女性。然而,几乎没有研究评估性取向与饮食质量之间的关系。
数据来自参加美国护士健康研究 3 期(Nurses' Health Study 3,一项正在进行的、基于美国的队列研究)的参与者(年龄 24-54 岁,N=15941)。我们使用高血压膳食疗法(Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension,DASH)和美国心脏协会(American Health Association,AHA)2020 年战略影响目标的建议来衡量饮食。
我们发现性取向对饮食质量的差异证据有限。在检查预测的 DASH 评分时,大多数异性恋女性[预测平均得分(95%置信区间),24.0(23.8,24.3)]和女同性恋女性[24.3(23.8,24.9)]比参考组(完全没有同性伴侣的异性恋女性)的预测 DASH 得分更健康[23.6(23.5,23.7)]。尽管某些性少数群体女性的整体预测 DASH 得分更健康,但她们对某些食物组(低脂乳制品和水果)的摄入量低于完全没有同性伴侣的异性恋女性。在衡量 AHA 评分时,大多数性少数群体(有同性伴侣的完全异性恋女性、大多数异性恋女性和女同性恋女性)的饮食质量都高于参考组(没有同性伴侣的完全异性恋女性)。
性少数群体女性,特别是大多数异性恋女性和女同性恋女性,其饮食质量比没有同性伴侣的完全异性恋女性更健康。这些数据表明,除了饮食之外,癌症风险因素(如吸烟、饮酒和缺乏运动)可能会导致性少数群体比异性恋女性的癌症发病率更高。尽管如此,所有女性都提高饮食质量至关重要,因为所有性取向的参与者的饮食质量都很差。