Han Fucai, Pearce Christopher Jon, Ng David Q K, Ramruttun Amit K, Chong Desmond Y R, Murphy Diarmuid, Lim Chin Tat, Lee Bernard C S
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Orthopaedics, Hand & Reconstructive Microsurgery Cluster, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Jurong Health Services, Singapore; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
Tension-band wire fixation of patellar fractures is associated with significant hardware-related complications and infection. Braided polyester suture fixation is an alternative option. However, these suture fixations have higher failure rates due to the difficulty in achieving rigid suture knot fixation. The Arthrex syndesmotic TightRope, which is a double-button adjustable loop fixation device utilizing a 4-point locking system using FibreWire, may not only offer stiff rigid fixation using a knotless system, but may also obviate the need for implant removal due to hardware related problems. The aim of our study is to compare the fixation rigidity of patella fractures using Tightrope versus conventional tension-band wiring (TBW) in a cadaveric model.
TBW fixation was compared to TightRope fixation of transverse patella fractures in 5 matched pairs of cadaveric knees. The knees were cyclically brought through 0-90° of motion for a total of 500 cycles. Fracture gapping was measured before the start of the cycling, and at 50, 100, 200 and 500 cycles using an extensometer. The mean maximum fracture gapping was derived. Failure of the construct was defined as a displacement of more than 3mm, patella fracture or implant breakage.
All but one knee from each group survived 500 cycles. The two failures were due to a fracture gap of more than 3mm during cycling. There was no significant difference in the mean number of cycles tolerated. There was no implant breakage. There was no statistical significant difference in mean maximum fracture gap between the TBW and TightRope group at all cyclical milestones after 500 cycles (0.3026±0.4091mm vs 0.3558±0.7173mm, p=0.388).
We found no difference between the TBW and Tightrope fixation in terms of fracture gapping and failure. With possible lower risk of complications such as implant migration and soft tissue irritation, we believe tightrope fixation is a feasible alternative in fracture management of transverse patella fractures.
髌骨骨折的张力带钢丝固定与显著的硬件相关并发症及感染有关。编织聚酯缝线固定是一种替代选择。然而,由于难以实现牢固的缝线结固定,这些缝线固定的失败率较高。Arthrex 下胫腓联合 TightRope 是一种双纽扣可调环固定装置,采用使用 FibreWire 的四点锁定系统,不仅可以使用无结系统提供牢固的刚性固定,还可能避免因硬件相关问题而需要取出植入物。我们研究的目的是在尸体模型中比较使用 TightRope 与传统张力带钢丝固定(TBW)治疗髌骨骨折的固定刚度。
在 5 对匹配的尸体膝关节中,将 TBW 固定与横行髌骨骨折的 TightRope 固定进行比较。膝关节循环运动 0 - 90°,共 500 个循环。在循环开始前以及使用引伸计在 50、100、200 和 500 个循环时测量骨折间隙。得出平均最大骨折间隙。构建物的失败定义为位移超过 3mm、髌骨骨折或植入物断裂。
每组除一只膝关节外,其余均存活 500 个循环。两次失败是由于循环过程中骨折间隙超过 3mm。耐受的平均循环次数无显著差异。没有植入物断裂。在 500 个循环后的所有循环里程碑处,TBW 组和 TightRope 组之间的平均最大骨折间隙无统计学显著差异(0.3026±0.4091mm 对 0.3558±0.7173mm,p = 0.388)。
我们发现 TBW 和 TightRope 固定在骨折间隙和失败方面没有差异。由于植入物移位和软组织刺激等并发症的风险可能较低,我们认为 TightRope 固定是横行髌骨骨折治疗中的一种可行替代方法。