Huang Daran, Koh Hun Yi, Lee Bing Howe, Bin Abd Razak Hamid Rahmatullah
Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Musculoskeletal Sciences, Duke-Nus Medical School, Singapore, SGP.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 6;16(10):e70956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70956. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Purpose Midpole patellar fractures are traditionally fixed with an "11-8" metal tension band construct. However, this technique is rife with implant-related complications. This study aims to evaluate the radiographic and functional outcomes following "all-suture" fixation of mid-pole patellar fractures as compared to resorbable screw-augmented suture fixation. Methods We retrospectively studied a consecutive series of 18 patients, 9 each with mid-pole patellar fractures treated with all-suture fixation or suture fixation augmented with bioabsorbable cancellous screws in our institution. The hybrid fixation cohort was significantly older (p<0.01). Radiographic and functional outcomes, such as time to union, postoperative range of motion (ROM), and the presence of complications such as fracture displacement were recorded and evaluated. The minimum follow-up was one year. Results All cases achieved radiographic union by 15 weeks postoperatively except one from the hybrid fixation cohort. The average time to radiographic union was comparable (p=0.30). Twenty-two point two percent (22.2%; 2 out of 9) of the cases from each cohort had an increase in the fracture gap (>2 mm) at around four to six weeks postoperatively, for which all except one case from the hybrid fixation cohort achieved union thereafter. One patient from the hybrid fixation cohort had fibrous non-union and further fracture displacement. There was another case of mild fracture gapping and screw breakage on review of postoperative radiographs at three months from the hybrid fixation cohort. These patients recovered without surgical revision or implant removal. Conclusions Both non-metal fixation methods for mid-pole transverse patellar fractures proved to be radiographically and functionally comparable.
目的 传统上,髌骨中极骨折采用“11-8”金属张力带结构固定。然而,该技术存在大量与植入物相关的并发症。本研究旨在评估与可吸收螺钉增强缝线固定相比,髌骨中极骨折“全缝线”固定后的影像学和功能结果。方法 我们回顾性研究了连续的18例患者,其中9例在我们机构接受了全缝线固定或生物可吸收松质骨螺钉增强缝线固定治疗的髌骨中极骨折。混合固定组患者年龄显著更大(p<0.01)。记录并评估影像学和功能结果,如愈合时间、术后活动范围(ROM)以及骨折移位等并发症的发生情况。最短随访时间为1年。结果 除混合固定组的1例患者外,所有病例术后15周均实现影像学愈合。影像学愈合的平均时间相当(p=0.30)。每个队列中22.2%(9例中的2例)的病例在术后约4至6周时骨折间隙增大(>2 mm),混合固定组中除1例病例外,其余病例此后均实现愈合。混合固定组的1例患者出现纤维性骨不连和进一步的骨折移位。在对混合固定组术后3个月的X线片复查时,还有1例出现轻度骨折间隙和螺钉断裂。这些患者未经手术翻修或取出植入物即康复。结论 两种用于髌骨中极横行骨折的非金属固定方法在影像学和功能方面均具有可比性。